Angle between polarizer and analyzer

  • Thread starter Thread starter bobsmithe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Polarizer
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a polarizer-analyzer arrangement and the calculation of the angle between the polarizer and analyzer axes based on the intensity reduction of light passing through them.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between intensity reduction and angle, with one participant attempting to apply the cosine squared formula incorrectly. Another participant clarifies the nature of the intensity reduction, prompting further exploration of the correct equation to use.

Discussion Status

The discussion has seen some productive clarification regarding the interpretation of intensity reduction. Participants are actively engaging with the mathematical relationships involved, though there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach yet.

Contextual Notes

There is some confusion regarding the interpretation of the percentage reduction in intensity, which affects the setup of the equations being used. Participants are navigating through the implications of this misunderstanding.

bobsmithe
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a polarizer-analyzer arrangement, as shown (here's a link http://i.imgur.com/APZRJ6J.png )

At what angle is the axis of the analyzer to the axis of the polarizer if, after passing through both sheets, the beam intensity is reduced by 67.6 percent?
Answer in units of ◦

Homework Equations


I=(1/2)I_o
I=I_o*cos^2(∅)

The Attempt at a Solution


Since the beam intensity is reduced by 67.7%, I knew I/I_o was .676, so I tried doing ∅=cos([itex]\sqrt{.676}[/itex]) but it wasn't right. I'm not sure what I did wrong and whether I'm supposed to use the first equation in this type of problem or not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It wasn't reduced to 67.6 percent. It was reduced by 67.6 percent
 
so that would mean that .324I=I_o*cos^2(∅)?
 
Last edited:
ok I got it. Thanks for pointing out my mistake
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K