Angle for a banked curve (friction-less surface)

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
12 replies · 13K views
physgrl
Messages
138
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



At what angle should the roadway on a curve with a 50 m radius be banked to allow cars to negotiate the curve at 12 m/s even if the roadway is frictionless?

a. 0°
b. 12.2°
c. 17.1°
d. 35.0°
e. 73.2°

Homework Equations



β=arctan(v^2/r*g)

The Attempt at a Solution



im using β=arctan(v^2/r*g) but the key says the answer is b?
can anyone help me figure out why its not 16.4??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why not try to derive the formula?
 
i did...i though of the triangle as if the gravity was pointing downward the centripetal force outward and then the angle should be the same as the angle for the curve right?
 
If your acceleration is towards the centre the force will be too. You need to find the angle of the road that gives a normal force with the horizontal component equal to the force needed to keep the circular motion described by v = 12 m/s and r = 50m

I'm aware that my response is a mouthful :smile:, feel free to ask me for clarification.
 
do you mean like a triangle with the vertical 9.81*m and the horizontal (12^2/50)*m ??
 
physgrl said:
do you mean like a triangle with the vertical 9.81*m and the horizontal (12^2/50)*m ??

Yes. But the horizontal component will be a fraction of the normal force, which depends on the angle.
 
I like Serena said:
Welcome to PF, physgrl! :smile:

I derived the same formula as you have.
When I fill in the values I also get 16.4 degrees.
So I believe your answer is correct (assuming you did not make a typo).

I believe your answer is incorrect, as I got 17.1 as my answer. You should investigate why you are using arctan.
 
dacruick said:
I believe your answer is incorrect, as I got 17.1 as my answer. You should investigate why you are using arctan.

Here's my interpretation of the forces.

attachment.php?attachmentid=40391&stc=1&d=1319734802.gif


We have:
[tex]F_{resultant} = {m v^2 \over r}[/tex]
[tex]\tan \beta = {F_{resultant} \over m g }[/tex]
The OP's formula follows from this.
 

Attachments

  • bankedroad.gif
    bankedroad.gif
    8.2 KB · Views: 2,176
Oooh I see where I went wrong. My apologies to all. I just always have trouble with the normal force being more than gravity. Its very unintuitive to me.