Angular Acceleration: 0.29 rad/s/s

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The angular acceleration of the test arm is calculated to be 0.29 rad/s² when a dynamometer reaches a speed of 180 degrees per second in 0.18 seconds. The formula used is angular acceleration (a) = change in angular velocity (w) / change in time (t), leading to a calculation of a = 180 deg/s / 0.18 s, which equals 16.67 deg/s². Converting degrees to radians using the factor of 57.3 results in an angular acceleration of 0.29 rad/s². The calculations presented are confirmed as correct by multiple participants in the discussion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular velocity and acceleration concepts
  • Familiarity with unit conversion between degrees and radians
  • Basic knowledge of kinematic equations
  • Ability to perform calculations involving time and angular measurements
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between angular velocity and angular acceleration in rotational dynamics
  • Learn about unit conversions between degrees and radians in physics
  • Explore more complex kinematic equations involving angular motion
  • Investigate applications of angular acceleration in real-world scenarios, such as machinery and robotics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on rotational dynamics, as well as educators and professionals involved in engineering and mechanics who require a solid understanding of angular motion principles.

PepperABLF12
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If a dynamometer is set to move at 180 deg/s and it takes 0.18 seconds to reach that speed. What was the angular acceleration of the test arm in radians/s/s to get to that velocity? Give your answer rounded to two decimal places and do not include units in answer.

Homework Equations



angular acceleration (a) = change in angular velocity (w)/change in time (t)
a = w/t

The Attempt at a Solution



t = 0.18s
w = 180deg/s
a = ?

a = w/t
a = 180/0.18
a = 16.67

To find radians, 16.67/57.3 = 0.29 rad/s/s.

Is this correct?

Thank you for your help! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks right to me.
 
Thank you!

Can anyone else see a problem with this?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K