Angular Acceleration Caused by Axehead on a Rotating Grindstone (Disk)

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angular acceleration and the number of turns a grindstone makes when a steel axe is pressed against it. The angular acceleration was initially calculated as -0.319 rad/s² using the kinetic friction force and torque equations. The user initially miscalculated the initial angular velocity in radians per second but later corrected it to 3.07π rad/s. After recalculating, they found that the grindstone would make approximately 23.205 rotations before coming to rest. The user resolved their confusion and confirmed their final answers as correct.
hdp12
Messages
67
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


PROBLEM:
You have a horizontal grindstone (a disk) that is mass m, has a radius r, and is turning at f in the positive direction. You then press a steel axe against the edge with a force of F in the radial direction.

y5gp4ep3.s2p.png


RANDOMIZED VARIABLES:
m= 95 kg
r= 0.33 m
f= 92 rpm
F= 25 N

a) Assuming the kinetic coefficient of friction between steel and stone is 0.20, calculate the angular acceleration of the grindstone in rad/s2
ANSWER: α = -0.319
See section 3 for explanation​

b) What is the number of turns, N, that the stone will make before coming to rest?
SUBMISSION HISTORY:
XN = 0.003
XN = 0.017

Homework Equations



τ=rFsin(θ)
τ=Iα
α=τNET/I
↓ Moment of Inertia of a uniform disk about its center of mass
I=\frac{1}{2}mR2
Fk= μkF
ωfi+αΔt
θfiiΔt+\frac{1}{2}αΔt2

The Attempt at a Solution



I solved part a) by doing the following
Kinetic Friction Force​
Fk= μkF
Torque by Fk
τ=rFsin(θ) = rFk = rμkF
Magnitude of Angular Acceleration (will be negative)​
α=τNET/I = rμkF/\frac{1}{2}mr2
= (0.33 m)(0.2)(25 N) / \frac{1}{2}(95 kg)(0.33 m)2
= -0.319 rad / s2

OKAY. Now onto the next part. Part b).
First I took the initial velocity, which is in rotations per minute, and converted it into radians per second
[STRIKE]rot[/STRIKE]/[STRIKE]min[/STRIKE] ·2∏r/[STRIKE]rot[/STRIKE] · 1 [STRIKE]min[/STRIKE]/60 s
=∏/30 rad/s

so if ωi = ∏/30 rad/s
& ωf = 0 rad/s
I can solve for time by using the formula ωfi+αΔt
0 rad/s = ∏/30 rad/s + -0.319 rad/s2Δt
-∏/30 rad/s = -0.319 rad/s2Δt
Δt = 0.3283 s

now using this time, I plug it and the rest of my variables into the formula θfiiΔt+\frac{1}{2}αΔt2
=(∏/30 rad/s)(0.3283 s) + \frac{1}{2}(-0.319 rad/s2)(0.3283 s)2
=0.03438 rad + -0.0172 rad
=0.01719 rad
1rot/2∏rad · 0.01719 rad = 0.002736 rot

I tried entering that, and it was incorrect. Then I tried entering the answer I got in radians and that was incorrect too.. So I guess I'm just confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh wow okay

I read back over my post and I already realized what I did... so I'm sorry.

for the initial speed I didn't convert it to radians per second... I converted one rotation to radians per second... smoothe.
Lemme try that again
f=92 [STRIKE]rot[/STRIKE]/[STRIKE]min[/STRIKE] ·2∏r/[STRIKE]rot[/STRIKE] · 1 [STRIKE]min[/STRIKE]/60 s
=92∏/30 rad/s
= 3.07∏ rad/s

so if ωi = 3.07∏ rad/s
& ωf = 0 rad/s
I can solve for time by using the formula ωfi+αΔt
0 rad/s = 3.07∏ rad/s + -0.319 rad/s2Δt
-3.07∏ rad/s = -0.319 rad/s2Δt
Δt = 30.2 s

now using this time, I plug it and the rest of my variables into the formula θfiiΔt+\frac{1}{2}αΔt2
=(3.07∏ rad/s)(30.2 s) + \frac{1}{2}(-0.319 rad/s2)(30.2 s)2
=291.27 rad + -145.47 rad
=145.8 rad
1rot/2∏rad · 145.8 rad = 23.205 rot

okay yes this is correct. CRISIS AVERTED SORRY
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K