MHB Angular and Linear Speed....Part 1

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angular Linear
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
You are given the rate of rotation of a wheel as well as its radius. For A-C, determine the following:

A. The angular speed, in units of radians/sec.

B. The linear speed, in units of cm/sec, of a point on the circumference of the wheel.

C. The linear speed, in cm/sec, of a point halfway between the center of the wheel and the circumference.

I will now post my effort.

Given: 500 rpm; r = 45 cm

Part A

The angular speed formula is w = θ/t.

I know that 1 revolution = 2pi radians.

I need θ.

θ = 500 (2pi radians)

θ = 1,000 pi radians.

w = 1,000 pi radians/sec

Book's answer is [50 pi/3] radians/sec. Something tells me that I needed to convert seconds to minutes. Yes?

Part B

I used the arc length formula, s = θr, as step 1.

s = (1,000 pi radians)(45 cm)

s = 45,000 pi cm = d

The letter d represents the distance in time t in the linear speed formula v = d/t.

v = 45,000 pi cm/sec is my answer.

Book's answer for Part B is 750 pi cm/sec.
Again, I am thinking that the units of conversation needed to be changed. Yes?

Part C

s = θr

s = (1,000 pi radians)(22.5 cm)

The decimal 22.5 came from dividing the radius in half in terms of the instructions for Part C above.

s = 22,500 pi cm = d

v = d/t

v = 22,500 pi cm/sec

Book's answer is 375 pi cm/sec.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
A. $$\omega=\frac{\theta}{t}$$

$$\omega=\frac{500\text{ rev}}{1\text{ min}}\cdot\frac{2\pi\text{ rad}}{1\text{ rev}}\cdot\frac{1\text{ min}}{60\text{ s}}=\frac{50\pi}{3}\,\frac{\text{rad}}{\text{s}}$$

B. $$v=\omega r$$

$$v=\left(\frac{50\pi}{3}\,\frac{\text{rad}}{\text{s}}\right)\left(45\text{ cm}\right)=750\pi\frac{\text{cm}}{\text{s}}$$

C. $$v=\omega r$$

$$v=\left(\frac{50\pi}{3}\,\frac{\text{rad}}{\text{s}}\right)\left(\frac{45}{2}\text{ cm}\right)=375\pi\frac{\text{cm}}{\text{s}}$$
 
MarkFL said:
A. $$\omega=\frac{\theta}{t}$$

$$\omega=\frac{500\text{ rev}}{1\text{ min}}\cdot\frac{2\pi\text{ rad}}{1\text{ rev}}\cdot\frac{1\text{ min}}{60\text{ s}}=\frac{50\pi}{3}\,\frac{\text{rad}}{\text{s}}$$

B. $$v=\omega r$$

$$v=\left(\frac{50\pi}{3}\,\frac{\text{rad}}{\text{s}}\right)\left(45\text{ cm}\right)=750\pi\frac{\text{cm}}{\text{s}}$$

C. $$v=\omega r$$

$$v=\left(\frac{50\pi}{3}\,\frac{\text{rad}}{\text{s}}\right)\left(\frac{45}{2}\text{ cm}\right)=375\pi\frac{\text{cm}}{\text{s}}$$

I follow everything you did here except for Part A.
Where did 50 pi/3 come from? Don't we multiply 500 rpm by 2 pi radians? Is 500 rpm • 2 pi radians not equal to 1,000 pi radians?
 
RTCNTC said:
I follow everything you did here except for Part A.
Where did 50 pi/3 come from? Don't we multiply 500 rpm by 2 pi radians? Is 500 rpm • 2 pi radians not equal to 1,000 pi radians?

Yes, but we also must divide by 60, and then reduce the fraction. :)
 
Oh boy! I better go back to 5th grade math.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
14K
Replies
10
Views
6K
Back
Top