Angular change in velocity (momentum)

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angular velocity of a merry-go-round after a child jumps on it, using conservation of momentum principles. The initial approach incorrectly applied the formula for rotational inertia, leading to an erroneous answer of 0.45 rad/s instead of the correct 0.38 rad/s. Participants emphasize the importance of using the correct formula for the rotational inertia of a point mass, which is mr². Additional resources are suggested for understanding the parallel axis theorem and the derivation of the relevant equations. The conversation highlights the need for careful application of physics concepts in problem-solving.
physgrl
Messages
138
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A merry-go-round has a radius of 3.0 m and a rotational inertia of 600 kg m2. The merry-go-round is initially at rest. A 20 kg child is running at 5.0 m/s along a line tangent to the rim. Find the angular velocity of the merry-go-round after the child jumps on.

a. 0.38 rad/s
b. 0.45 rad/s
c. 0.71 rad/s
d. 0.56 rad/s
e. 1.2 rad/s


Homework Equations



p(angular)=Iω
p=mv
p(angular)=p*r


The Attempt at a Solution



i tried to use conservation of momentum by saying:

r*mv+0=(I+mr)ω

and i got ω=0.45 but the answer key says the answer is a. 0.38 rad/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
physgrl said:
i tried to use conservation of momentum by saying:

r*mv+0=(I+mr
Right idea, but you used the wrong formula for the rotational inertia of the child. What's the rotational inertia of a point mass (we can treat the child as a point mass) that is some distance from the axis?

(Always check units. What are the units of I? Does mr have those units?)
 
Ohh so it will be mr^2 right? :)
How is it derived anyways?
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K