Angular Moment Cube: Calculating $\vec{L}$

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angular momentum of a homogeneous cube spinning around one of its diagonals. The key formula derived is that the angular momentum relative to a fixed vertex is expressed as \(\sqrt{\frac{43}{3}}Ma^2w\). Participants calculated the inertia tensors and attempted to clarify the representation of the angular velocity vector \(\vec{w}\), with some confusion about the necessity of using both inertia components in the angular momentum equation. Ultimately, the correct norm of the angular momentum vector was confirmed, leading to the final result. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding inertia tensors and the parallel axis theorem in rotational dynamics.
rmfw
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An homogeneous cube of mass M and side 2a spins around one diagonal of the faces with constant angular velocity w. Show that the size of the angular moment in relation to one of the fixed vertexes is \sqrt{\frac{43}{3}}Ma^2w

What I visualize here is a cube with one of its vertexes on the origin and then it spits in a way that the vertex on the origin is always keeps there.

Homework Equations

\vec{L}=\vec{L}_{cm;O} + \vec{L}_{rel cm} = I \vec{w} + I_{cm} \vec{w}

where I are inertia tensors

The Attempt at a Solution



I was able to calculate the inertia tensors:

I =Ma^2 \begin{pmatrix} \frac{2}{3} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & \frac{2}{3} & 0 \\0 & 0 & \frac{2}{3} \end{pmatrix}

I_{cm} =Ma^2 \begin{pmatrix} 2 & -1 & -1 \\ -1 & 2 & -1 \\-1 & -1 & 2 \end{pmatrix}

but now I'm stuck on what the vector w should represent, I think it has something to do with euler angles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##\omega## points along the axis of the rotation = the axis of fixed points.
 
you mean like \vec{w} = (cos (\frac{pi}{4}) w ; 0 ; sen(\frac{pi}{4}) w)? considering that the diagonal which upon the cube rotates is in the xOz plane.

I tried that with no success.
 
That's a complicated way to express that vector, but yes.

I tried that with no success.
What went wrong?

I don't understand your Icm, and I don't think it is necessary to treat everything as tensors, but it should be possible.
 
Sorry for the above post, somehow I managed to post a duplicate reply and now I can't delete it.

Using the formulas for the first part of the angular momentum I got:

L_{x}=\frac{2Ma^2}{3\sqrt{2}}<br /> L_{y}=0<br /> L_{z}=\frac{2Ma^2}{3\sqrt{2}}

for the second part of the equation:

L_{x}=\frac{Ma^2}{\sqrt{2}}<br /> L_{y}=\frac{-2Ma^2}{\sqrt{2}}<br /> L_{z}=\frac{Ma^2}{\sqrt{2}}

adding:
<br /> L_{x}=\frac{5Ma^2}{3\sqrt{2}}<br /> L_{y}=\frac{-2Ma^2}{\sqrt{2}}<br /> L_{z}=\frac{5Ma^2}{3\sqrt{2}}

then calculating the norm gives the result \frac{\sqrt{43}Ma^2w}{3}, well looks like this time I got it right, seems like I had transcribed the question wrong, the 3 goes outside the root.

mfb said:
I don't understand your Icm, and I don't think it is necessary to treat everything as tensors, but it should be possible.

I just used the tensor formula but instead of integrating I assumed the whole mass was in the point of coordinates (a,a,a), for example:
I_{11}=M[ (a^2 +a^2+a^2) - a^2] = 2Ma^2

Honestly I didn't quite understand why we have to calculate the second component on the right side of the angular momentum equation since it only says "relatively to the origin", are both of the componets always necessary ? could you give me some insight on it? And perhaps tell me how you would solve the problem. Thanks!
 
Last edited:
The moment of inertia of a cube for a rotation around its center of mass does not depend on the axis (as all 3 principal axes have the same moment of inertia), afterwards you just need the distance of the axis of rotation to the center of the cube and you can use the parallel axis theorem.

I don't get that sqrt(43).
 
Its just the result of the L vector norm :

w\sqrt{(\frac{5Ma^2}{3\sqrt{2}})^2+ (\frac{-2Ma^2}{\sqrt{2}}) ^2 +(\frac{5Ma^2}{3\sqrt{2}})^2}=\frac{\sqrt{43}Ma^2w}{3}
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K