Angular momentum and perfectly inelastic collision

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a ball being thrown at an apparatus, which catches the ball and begins to rotate. The discussion centers around understanding the concepts of angular momentum, rotational motion, and the effects of friction in a perfectly inelastic collision context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the initial conditions of the system, including the velocities and masses involved. There are attempts to calculate the final velocity after the collision and the subsequent angular velocity. Questions arise regarding the role of gravity and energy loss during the collision. Some participants suggest considering the energy of the system and the effects of friction on the apparatus's rotation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring various aspects of the problem, including the direction of rotation and the implications of torque and moment of inertia. There is a recognition of the need to clarify the axis of rotation, and some guidance has been offered regarding the use of torque to find angular acceleration.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating assumptions about the orientation of the apparatus and the effects of gravitational potential energy. There is also a mention of the energy lost as heat due to friction, which adds complexity to the analysis.

cozzbp
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi, I just don't really understand rotational motion very well, and I don't know how to proceed with this problem.

Homework Statement


You throw a 235 g ball 26 m/s at the apparatus shown in the figure.
http://volta.byu.edu/ph121/homework/hw18f3.png
The apparatus catches the ball, causing it to rotate. There is a kinetic frictional force on the bearing of the ball of 17 Newtons. The bearing has a radius of a=2.5 cm and the apparatus has a distance of r=1.2 m between the catcher and the axis of rotation. The catcher has a mass of 408 g and the rest of the apparatus has negligible mass. How many revolutions does the apparatus rotate before it stops?

Homework Equations


L = mvr
[tex]\Sigma[/tex][tex]\tau[/tex] = I[tex]\alpha[/tex]
[tex]\omega[/tex]=v/r

The Attempt at a Solution


Here is what I have tried so far...
First, I need to find the velocity after the ball and the apparatus collide. So,
mball*vball = (mball + mcatcher)*vf
.235 * 26 = (.235 + .408)*vf
solving for vf yields 9.5 m/s
then I can find the angular velocity using [tex]\omega[/tex] = vf/r
9.5/2.5 = 7.92 rad/s
I can also get the angular momentum from this.
My problem is, is that I have no idea how to factor gravity into the whole equation. I figure if I could find [tex]\alpha[/tex], then I could use a rotational kinematic equation to find the change in [tex]\vartheta[/tex]. My other thought was that I could somehow use the friction and rotational kinetic energy to find when it stops. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
consider the energy of the system.

the ball has an initial K.E. The catcher and the ball are associated with some gravitational potential energy (depending on where you take your reference)

for each revolution, the system lose energy as heat W=2(pi)a*friction.
 
When the ball collides with the catcher, does the system lose some kinetic energy as well?
 
First of all is the catcher rotating about a horizontal axis or a vertical one?

I would read it as not necessarily horizontal axis and hence you need only find the resisting torque of the friction applied to slowing the system after determining initial ω. In which case aren't you just using simple rotational kinematic means to solve for θ?

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/mi.html#rlin
 
Ok! I never even thought of the possibility that it wasn't vertical. So now my thinking is to use torque = 17 N * .025 m and divide that by the moment of inertia MR^2 to get angular acceleration. Then I can just use simple kinematics. Does that sound correct?
 
cozzbp said:
Ok! I never even thought of the possibility that it wasn't vertical. So now my thinking is to use torque = 17 N * .025 m and divide that by the moment of inertia MR^2 to get angular acceleration. Then I can just use simple kinematics. Does that sound correct?

Looks like a plan to me.

If it's vertically rotating it will more likely at some point either fall forward or backward to settle at the bottom after some number of revolutions. I would think that case doesn't teach the concepts as readily.
 

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
335
Views
17K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K