Angular momentum/Hamiltonian operators, magnetic field, basis states problem?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 4K views
jeebs
Messages
314
Reaction score
5
Hi,
Here's my problem, probably not that difficult in reality but I don't get how to approach it, and I've got an exam coming up soon...

An atom with total angular momentum l=1 is prepared in an eigenstate of Lx, with an eigenvalue of [tex]\hbar[/tex]. (Lx is the angular momentum operator for the x-component). It then passes into a region where there is a uniform magnetic field B in the z-direction. The Hamiltonian acting on the angular part of the wavefunction in the magnetic field is:
[tex]H = \frac{e}{2m_e}BL_z[/tex] where me is the electron mass.

I have to "Express the initial state of the angular momentum in the basis of the eigenstate of this Hamiltonian."

I am also given the matrix representation of the operators Lx Ly and Lz:

[ 0 1 0 ]
[ 1 0 1 ]
[ 0 1 0 ][tex]\frac{\hbar}{\sqrt{2}} = L_x[/tex]

[ 0 1 0 ]
[-1 0 1 ]
[ 0 -1 0][tex]-i\frac{\hbar}{\sqrt{2}} = L_y[/tex]

[1 0 0 ]
[0 0 0 ]
[0 0 -1][tex]\hbar = L_z[/tex]

So, I haven't really made much progress with this. What I've thought so far is to start with v being the initial eigenstate the atom is in before the field comes, so that
[tex]L_xv = \hbar v[/tex]

and then when the field is on, the atom is going to be in one of the eigenstates ui of the operator H, where [tex]Hu_i = \frac{e}{2m_e}BL_zu_i[/tex]

Am I actually being asked to write v in terms of a linear combination of ui's?
If so, then I am stumped as to how to proceed next, and if not, then I haven't got the slightest clue what I'm supposed to be doing.

Can anyone point me in the right direction?
Much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kuruman said:
First you diagonalize the matrix representing Lx. The state you want is the eigenvector corresponding to eigenvalue [tex]+\hbar[/tex].

I wasn't sure what diagonalizing meant so I looked on wikipedia. Apparently, if I have an NxN matrix with N eigenvalues, diagonalizing it means writing a diagonal matrix of those 3 eigenvalues, with zeros everywhere else, right?

well, we are only given one eigenvalue for the Lx matrix, namely [tex]\hbar[/tex] - how can I make a 3x3 diagonal matrix out of that?
I'm still really not sure what's meant to be going on here...
 
jeebs said:
I wasn't sure what diagonalizing meant so I looked on wikipedia. Apparently, if I have an NxN matrix with N eigenvalues, diagonalizing it means writing a diagonal matrix of those 3 eigenvalues, with zeros everywhere else, right?

well, we are only given one eigenvalue for the Lx matrix, namely [tex]\hbar[/tex] - how can I make a 3x3 diagonal matrix out of that?
I'm still really not sure what's meant to be going on here...
Look at this link

http://www.fen.bilkent.edu.tr/~degt/math220/diag.pdf

It provides an example for a 3x3 matrix just like you have. Try to follow the example and if you get stuck let me know.