Animating Black holes and Singularities - Comments

  • Insights
  • Thread starter edguy99
  • Start date
  • #1
edguy99
Gold Member
450
29
edguy99 submitted a new PF Insights post

https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/animating-black-holes-singularities-infinite-force-gravity/ [Broken]

https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/graviytanimation-80x80.png [Broken]

https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/animating-black-holes-singularities-infinite-force-gravity/ [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt

Answers and Replies

  • #2
phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2019 Award
16,546
6,904
I don't know if you meant your statements about elastic collisions and inelastic collisions to be just special cases that you are using or if you think that they are correct general definitions, but just to be clear, as general definitions, your statements are both wrong so if you intend them to be a special case, you should probably edit to state that.
 
  • #3
1
0
is the black hole really exist?
 
  • #4
wabbit
Gold Member
1,284
207
Sorry if you covered this in a previous post which I missed, but I am a little confused about the nature of these animations : are they simulating an approximation of GR, or a different system which displays qualitative analogies with GR ?
Either is interesting, but i would be helpful if you could clarify this point, and if it is an approximation of GR, maybe explain a bit more about how your equations relate to those of GR or where the approximation is expected to be valid.
Thanks
 
  • Like
Likes Ben Niehoff
  • #5
edguy99
Gold Member
450
29
is the black hole really exist?
You bet they do. We see stuff fall into them and we can detect their gravity pull on other objects.
 
  • #6
edguy99
Gold Member
450
29
In response to the question by wabbit, "are they simulating an approximation of GR, or an analogy with GR?"

Good question, I would say a combination.

WRT use of the distance cubed factor to produce precession, this is an approximation. But it sure works well, enabling orbits with a precession rate as fast as their orbit rate. It is required to give the animation the curve into the center. If you don't use the cubed factor, you end up with an ellipse. As to how it relates to GR, I am guessing an accurate GR equation would have a cubed factor, maybe a forth and so on, each of which would have a smaller effect.

WRT to inertia between emitting and absorbing bodies, this to me is a qualitative analogy with GR.
 

Related Threads on Animating Black holes and Singularities - Comments

  • Last Post
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
926
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
3K
Top