What is the maximum distance the frame moves when a putty is dropped onto it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Swatch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum distance a frame moves when a lump of putty is dropped onto it. The frame, weighing 0.150 kg, stretches a spring by 0.050 m, leading to a spring constant of 29.4 N/m. The putty, weighing 0.200 kg, is dropped from a height of 30.0 cm, and the conservation of momentum is applied during the collision with the frame. The final calculations involve both conservation of energy and accounting for the initial elastic potential energy of the spring, which was initially overlooked, leading to incorrect results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of momentum in collisions
  • Knowledge of conservation of energy principles
  • Familiarity with gravitational and elastic potential energy calculations
  • Ability to calculate spring constants and their implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of conservation of momentum in inelastic collisions
  • Learn about gravitational potential energy and its role in dynamic systems
  • Explore elastic potential energy and its effects on spring systems
  • Investigate the implications of initial conditions in energy conservation problems
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone involved in dynamics and energy conservation problems in mechanical systems.

Swatch
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
A 0.150 kg frame when suspended from a spring, stretches the spring 0.050 m. A 0.200 kg lump of putty is dropped from rest onto the frame from a height of 30.0 cm. I have to find the maximum distance the frame moves downward from its initial position.

I have calculated the spring constant to be 1.47N/0.050m = 29.4 N/m

The first stage is when the putty is falling down or:
Vp2 = sqrt(0.6*g)

Then I'm not sure. Can I say that momentum is conserved during the collision of the putty and frame?

The last stage would be conservation of energy when putty and frame travel downwards. But I need to know the total speed.

Could someone please give me a hint
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes use conservation of momentum to find the speed of the system putty+frame.
 
But since there is a force of gravitation can I really use conservation of momentum?
 
Yes, it would be an impulse approximation. During the collision the force will be greater than the magnitude of the gravitation force, because the time of collision will be small.
 
O.K. What I've done is this.

For the spring I calculated the spring constant

K=1.47N/0.050m = 29.4 N/m

For the falling putty I found the final speed of the putty just before it hits the frame.
Vp2 = sqrt(g*0.6)

The collision of the putty and frame is
Vt = speed of putty and frame

Vt = mpVp2/mt
(where mp is the mass of the putty, mt is the mass of the putty and frame).

Then when the frame and putty are traveling downwards I use conservation of energy

Ug2 + Ue2 = K1 + Ug1 + Ue1 - K2
(Ug =gravitational potential energy, Ue = elastic potential energy)

Here I end up with:

y(squared)*k*0.5 + y*g*mt = 0.5mp(squared) * g*0.6/mt(squared) + 0.0367

From this I get y = (-3.43 +- sqrt(11.8+10.7) )/29.4

I should get 23.2 cm But I always get a wrong answer.

Does anyone see what I'm doing wrong?
 
I can't quite follow the details of your calculations, but when you apply conservation of energy after the collision be sure to take into account that the spring has an initial elastic potential energy since it is stretched. You are trying to find the amount of additional stretch.
 
After the collision I did:

Ug2 + Ue2 = K1 + Ug1 + Ue1 - K2
(Ug =gravitational potential energy, Ue = elastic potential energy)

mt*g*y + 0.5*k*y(squared) = 0.5*mt*vt(squared) + 0 + 0.5*k*0.050(squared) - 0

where k is the spring constant

I take the origin to be where the spring in unstreched and the stretched position as -0.050m.
 
What about Ug1? If the origin is the unstretched postion, then Ug1 is not zero.
 
Ug1 was the problem. Thanks Doc Al.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
13K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
40K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K