New Organ Discovered: Something New Every Day

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tom.G
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Discovery Human
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The recent discovery of the interstitium as a new organ has sparked significant discussion within the scientific community. This finding, published on March 27, 2018, proposes a revision of the macro- and microanatomy of the human interstitium, highlighting its role as a fluid-filled space within and between tissues. The implications of this discovery may extend to understanding certain diseases, particularly those related to the lymphatic system. The debate surrounding the definition of an organ and the validity of this discovery continues among researchers and enthusiasts alike.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of human anatomy and histology
  • Familiarity with the lymphatic system and its physiological functions
  • Knowledge of scientific publication standards and peer review processes
  • Awareness of recent advancements in medical research, particularly regarding organ classification
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the anatomical and histological characteristics of the interstitium
  • Explore the implications of the interstitium's discovery on cancer research and lymphatic system studies
  • Investigate the criteria used to classify structures as organs in human anatomy
  • Review the peer-reviewed article published in Nature regarding the interstitium for detailed insights
USEFUL FOR

Medical researchers, anatomists, oncologists, and anyone interested in the evolving definitions of human anatomy and the implications of new organ discoveries.

Biology news on Phys.org
Yes, I read it too. It was quite interesting. Also the cancer connection to the lymph system
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stavros Kiri
Interstitium, the new organ, was based on the original paper quoted by the OP above. The article was published March 27, 2018.
E.g. Relevant quotes:
"and as a result propose a large-scale revision of the macro- and microanatomy of the human interstitium."

"In sum, we describe the anatomy and histology of a previously unrecognized, though widespread, macroscopic, fluid-filled space within and between tissues, a novel expansion and specification of the concept of the human interstitium."

Last time a new organ was discovered was around Christmas time (more than a year ago - see previous post). This time it happened around Easter time. It seems, either way, we get an organ as a gift! ...
 
These 'new organs' were of course existent known structures before, but their exact coherence, function and role was just realized, understood and announced recently, "exalting" them to the level of 'organ' ...

I think it's also a matter of definition, [i.e.] what we consider as organ and what not ...
It reminds me the similar case/story of Pluto (in Astronomy), i.e. whether Pluto is a planet or not ...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: larry909 and BillTre
I think the important thing about it was, there was a lymphatic system known physiological function.
This thing just seems to be what is immediately upstream of the lymphatic system (that's my understanding at least) and feeds into it).
It would seem to be something that is elaborated through, at least, many different tissues.

It was not known, or previously described as a deficiency in understanding, previously.
It could explain some obscure aspects of certain diseases.
 
BillTre said:
It could explain some obscure aspects of certain diseases.
Like this, for instance (?) ...
jedishrfu said:
the cancer connection to the lymph system
 
something ain't right here, not sure what it is but I doubt they found a new organ. anywho if they did (they didn't), from what I can understand about that especially long winded explanation and it didn't make sense to me that they were staining live subject or figured out they were stem cells from staining. nothing about this article seems right.

I guess I could dig deeper but I don't really care enough to, just because it's in the journal Nature doesn't make it true.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chris Riccard said:
true
What do you mean "true"? It doesn't have to be true to be scientific. As long as it is properly supported ... . That's how science evolves.
Do you have any references to support your view?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K