High Energy Another typo in Peskin & Schroeder's QFT?

  • Thread starter Thread starter apostolosdt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Peskin Qft
apostolosdt
Messages
178
Reaction score
204
I'm using a Peskin & Schroeder's copy that looks like it has all typos corrected and I wonder if the following is an undetected typo:
On pp. 103 and on the RHS of the bra expression just after (4.68), shouldn't the ##\phi_f({\mathbf p}_f)## be complex conjugated?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Reply
  • Like
Likes Delta2, malawi_glenn and vanhees71
Physics news on Phys.org

Thread 'Learn Python: Top Book Recommendations for Beginners'

I'm looking at a book called python crash course for beginners (eric mathes), does anyone have experience of using this book or any other book that you would recommend for learning python if not that, is there a specific course you'd suggest that isn't in book form? I'm completely new to programming if it helps. So i need a gameplan for learning it quite quickly for my undergrad studies
View full post »

Similar threads

High Energy Possible typo in Peskin & Schroeder's QFT Textbook (p. 666)?
Replies
7
Views
3K
A Interpreting the energy density of QFT vacuum states
Replies
3
Views
1K
A Smart Algebra of Exp. on Pg 191 of Peskin & Schroeder
Replies
3
Views
2K
Quantizing the complex Klein-Gordon field
Replies
2
Views
2K
Exploring Peskin & Schroeder's QFT Propositions on p. 166
Replies
1
Views
4K
High Energy Recommended books in HEP, QFT, QM, GR
Replies
9
Views
5K
Feynman Parameters-Peskin&Schroeder 6.44
Replies
6
Views
6K
A Wilsonian RG and Effective Field Theories
Replies
2
Views
3K
Peskin & Schroeder's proof of Wick's Theorem
Replies
2
Views
11K
How Do Peskin and Schroeder Derive the Integral in Equation (2.52)?
Replies
4
Views
10K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top