High Energy Another typo in Peskin & Schroeder's QFT?

  • Thread starter Thread starter apostolosdt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Peskin Qft
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a potential typo in Peskin & Schroeder's Quantum Field Theory, specifically regarding the expression on page 103 following equation (4.68). The poster questions whether the field ##\phi_f({\mathbf p}_f)## should be complex conjugated in that context. The consensus is that it indeed should be complex conjugated, confirming the suspicion of an undetected error. This highlights the importance of careful proofreading in academic texts. Typos in foundational texts like this can lead to misunderstandings in complex topics.
apostolosdt
Messages
178
Reaction score
204
I'm using a Peskin & Schroeder's copy that looks like it has all typos corrected and I wonder if the following is an undetected typo:
On pp. 103 and on the RHS of the bra expression just after (4.68), shouldn't the ##\phi_f({\mathbf p}_f)## be complex conjugated?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Delta2, malawi_glenn and vanhees71
Physics news on Phys.org
Many years ago, as the internet was coming of age, I burned over 500 pounds of technical manuals. I realized I can look things up on the internet faster than I can find something in a technical manual. And just about anything I might need could be found online. But letting go of my several shelves worth of college text and other science books is another matter. I can't bring myself to get rid of them but there is very little if anything I can't find online now. Books are heavy and a pain...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
10K