High Energy Another typo in Peskin & Schroeder's QFT?

  • Thread starter Thread starter apostolosdt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Peskin Qft
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion addresses a potential typo in the textbook "An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory" by Peskin & Schroeder. Specifically, the user questions whether the expression on page 103, following equation (4.68), should include a complex conjugate for ##\phi_f({\mathbf p}_f)##. The consensus confirms that the expression indeed requires the complex conjugation, highlighting the importance of accuracy in quantum field theory texts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with Quantum Field Theory concepts
  • Understanding of complex conjugates in mathematical expressions
  • Knowledge of Peskin & Schroeder's textbook structure
  • Basic proficiency in interpreting mathematical notation used in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the corrections in Peskin & Schroeder's QFT editions
  • Study complex conjugation in quantum mechanics
  • Examine common typographical errors in physics literature
  • Explore additional resources on Quantum Field Theory notation
USEFUL FOR

Students of Quantum Field Theory, physicists referencing Peskin & Schroeder, and anyone involved in the editing or proofreading of scientific texts.

apostolosdt
Messages
178
Reaction score
204
I'm using a Peskin & Schroeder's copy that looks like it has all typos corrected and I wonder if the following is an undetected typo:
On pp. 103 and on the RHS of the bra expression just after (4.68), shouldn't the ##\phi_f({\mathbf p}_f)## be complex conjugated?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Delta2, malawi_glenn and vanhees71
Physics news on Phys.org
i am self learning physics. have you ever worked your way backwards again after finishing most undergrad courses? i have textbooks for junior/senior physics courses in classical mechanics, electrodynamics, thermal physics, quantum mechanics, and mathematical methods for self learning. i have the Halliday Resnick sophomore book. working backwards, i checked out Conceptual Physics 11th edition by Hewitt and found this book very helpful. What i liked most was how stimulating the pictures...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
10K