MHB Answer Sub Vector Spaces: U, W & V - Correct Answers

Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am struggling with this question...

U is a set of all matrices of order 3X3, in which there is at least one row of 0's.

W is the set of matrices:

a b
c b+c-3a

where a,b,c are real numbers.

V is the set of vectors: (x,y,z,w), for which 5(y-1)=z-5

which two of these statements are correct ?

a. U is a vector subspace with dimension of 9
b. U is a vector subspace with dimension of 6
c. W is a vector subspace with dimension of 2
d. W is a vector subspace with dimension of 3
e. V is a vector subspace with dimension of 3
f. V is a vector subspace with dimension of 2
g. V and U are not sub-spaces

I think that U should be, but I don't know, the 0's confuse me, and I don't know about W and V.
thank you...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
U is not a vector space because it is not closed under addition. W and V are vector spaces. For example, suppose (x, y, z, w) and (x', y', z', w') are in V, so 5(y - 1) = z - 5 and 5(y' - 1) = z' - 5. This is equivalent to 5y = z and 5y' = z', so 5(y + y') = z + z', or 5(y + y' - 1) = z + z' - 5. Therefore, (x + x', y + y', z + z', w + w') is also in V. Note that if the equation were 5(y - 1) = z - 6, then V would not be closed under addition. You need to check the remaining axioms of a vector space.

In the case of W, one can independently choose a, b and c; then the fourth element of the matrix is fixed. Therefore, the dimension of W is 3. In other words, $\begin{pmatrix}1 & 0\\0 & -3\end{pmatrix}$, $\begin{pmatrix}0 & 1\\0 & 1\end{pmatrix}$ and $\begin{pmatrix}0 & 0\\1 & 1\end{pmatrix}$ are the basis elements. Similarly, for V we have four numbers and one equation relating them, so the dimension again is 3.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K