ANSYS RBE3 command vs Contact Wizard

  • Thread starter Thread starter CFDFEAGURU
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ansys Contact
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of the RBE3 command versus the Contact Wizard in ANSYS for creating constraint equations. Participants share their experiences and preferences regarding these tools, touching on aspects of efficiency and usability.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express a preference for the RBE3 command due to negative experiences with the Contact Wizard.
  • One participant questions whether RBE3s have an advantage over MPC connections, noting that RBE3s are nodal while MPCs are surface-based.
  • Concerns are raised about the inefficiency of using constraint equations with a large number of nodes, particularly in relation to solution time.
  • Another participant mentions that RBE3s are force-distributed, which may lead to more accurate moment applications.
  • There is a discussion about the requirement of a parameter array for slave nodes in version 12.1, which some participants find cumbersome compared to other commands.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the advantages of RBE3s versus MPCs, and there are differing opinions on the usability of the Contact Wizard. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to use.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of clarity on the specific advantages of RBE3s over MPCs and the potential inefficiencies introduced by using constraint equations with many nodes. The discussion also highlights a specific version-related requirement that may affect user experience.

CFDFEAGURU
Messages
781
Reaction score
10
Hello all,

Just thought I would throw this one out there.

Who preferes to use the RBE3 command to automatically create a set of constraint equations and who prefers to use the Contact Wizard?

I used to use the Contact Wizard but I recently got burned by it, so I switched to using the RBE3 command, which isn't the most pleasant command either but hey it's ANSYS.

Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Thanks
Mattt
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I've personally never used RBE3s. I've either used MPC connections or CE/CPs. Do RBE3s have an advantage being nodal over MPCs (surface based)?
 
Do RBE3s have an advantage being nodal over MPCs (surface based)?

I am not sure is there is an actual advantage. I do know that using constraint equations with a large number of nodes can cause some inefficiency in the solution time.

In version 12.1 you have to use a parameter array for the slave nodes. A component will not work.

Thanks
Matt
 
I see that RBE3s are force-distributed rather than directly "coupled". This could things like applying moments probably more accurate. The thing about the parameter array is kinda dumb though. Why?
 
Why?

I am not sure. I had to call tech support because I didn't know you had to use a parameter array either. You can use components for every other command. I made a short text file that can be used for the job. It is a modification of the one that the tech support group sent me.

Let me know if you want it.

Thanks
Matt
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
32K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
37K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
13K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
37K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K