I Anti-symmetric part of an equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter GR191511
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the anti-symmetric part of the equation X_{a}∂_{b}X_{c} and its implications in the context of Einstein's relativity. It highlights that the first term on the right side is symmetric in indices a and c, while the second term is symmetric in b and c, leading to the conclusion that their totally anti-symmetric parts vanish. Participants clarify the definition of the totally anti-symmetric part, emphasizing that it changes sign with any interchange of indices. The notation used for the anti-symmetric part is also discussed, correcting misconceptions about which indices are affected. Overall, the conversation deepens the understanding of symmetry and anti-symmetry in tensor equations.
GR191511
Messages
76
Reaction score
6
I'm reading "Introducing Einstein's Relativity_A Deeper Understanding Ed 2"on page 271:
##X_{a}\partial_{b}X_{c}=\lambda f_{,a}\lambda_{,b}f_{,c}+\lambda^2f_{,a}f_{,cb}##
Taking the totally anti-symmetric part of this equation and noting that the first term on the right is symmetric in a and c and the second term is symmetric in b and c,we see that their totally anti-symmetric parts vanish...
"their totally anti-symmetric parts vanish"Why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GR191511 said:
I'm reading "Introducing Einstein's Relativity_A Deeper Understanding Ed 2"on page 271:
##X_{a}\partial_{b}X_{c}=\lambda f_{,a}\lambda_{,b}f_{,c}+\lambda^2f_{,a}f_{,cb}##
Taking the totally anti-symmetric part of this equation and noting that the first term on the right is symmetric in a and c and the second term is symmetric in b and c,we see that their totally anti-symmetric parts vanish...
"their totally anti-symmetric parts vanish"Why?
May be you can start with reminding yourself what totaly anti-symmetric part is.
 
GR191511 said:
Why?
Because:
GR191511 said:
the first term on the right is symmetric in a and c and the second term is symmetric in b and c
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark and GR191511
Orodruin said:
Because:
Is the" totaly anti-symmetric part"of that equation##X_{[a}\partial_{b}X_{c]}+X_{a[}\partial_{b}X_{c]}+X_{[a}\partial_{b]}X_{c}##?
 
No, it is ##X_{[a}\partial_b X_{c]}##. Meaning that it should change sign whenever you interchange any of the three indices.
 
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn and topsquark
Orodruin said:
No, it is ##X_{[a}\partial_b X_{c]}##. Meaning that it should change sign whenever you interchange any of the three indices.
any of the three indices?Doesn't the notation ##X_{[a}\partial_b X_{c]}##means that "a" exchanges with "c" only?
 
GR191511 said:
any of the three indices?Doesn't the notation ##X_{[a}\partial_b X_{c]}##means that "a" exchanges with "c" only?
No. All your indices are within the square brackets.
 
GR191511 said:
any of the three indices?Doesn't the notation ##X_{[a}\partial_b X_{c]}##means that "a" exchanges with "c" only?
No. That would be ##X_{[a|}\partial_bX_{|c]}##, where the ##|## symbols are used to exclude indices between them from round or square brackets.
 
Ibix said:
No. That would be ##X_{[a|}\partial_bX_{|c]}##, where the ##|## symbols are used to exclude indices between them from round or square brackets.
o_O...OK!##X_{[a}\partial_bX_{c]}=\frac 1 6(X_{a}\partial_bX_{c}+X_{c}\partial_aX_{b}+X_{b}\partial_cX_{a}-X_{a}\partial_cX_{b}-X_{b}\partial_aX_{c}-X_{c}\partial_bX_{a})##?
 
  • #10
GR191511 said:
o_O...OK!##X_{[a}\partial_bX_{c]}=\frac 1 6(X_{a}\partial_bX_{c}+X_{c}\partial_aX_{b}+X_{b}\partial_cX_{a}-X_{a}\partial_cX_{b}-X_{b}\partial_aX_{c}-X_{c}\partial_bX_{a})##?
Yes.
 

Similar threads

  • Sticky
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
71
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K