MHB Antinodes and Nodes on a Waveworm

  • Thread starter Thread starter tristancohn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nodes
tristancohn
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
i have a waveform:
y2(x)= sin(x*1.2)+sin(x*1.8)

the first 6 nodes, meaning the parts of the wave where y2=0 come up on my graph at around x =

2.094
4.189
5.236
6.283
8.377
10.471

you can find the nodes easily (where y2=0) with either x = n*pi/(1.5) or x = (2n+1)*(pi/0.6), where n = 0, 1,2 3, and so on.

what I really want to find is the antinodes (peaks) of y2, similar to on this graph where the line turns black:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7a/Graph_of_sliding_derivative_line.gif

which are at around x =

1.006
2.979
4.665
5.808
7.492
9.466

I know that the antinodes for y2 come up at 1.8*COS(1.8*x)+1.2*COS(1.2*x)=0
but i just can't find a clean way of finding them.
:confused:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We are given the waveform:

$$y_2(x)=\sin\left(\frac{6}{5}x \right)+\sin\left(\frac{9}{5}x \right)$$

It appears what you have done to find the nodes is apply a sum to product identity to get:

$$y_2(x)=2\sin\left(\frac{3}{2}x \right)\cos\left(\frac{3}{10}x \right)$$

Because, in this form, the angular velocity of the sine factor is an odd multiple of that of the cosine factor, the period $T$ of the function is therefore:

$$T=\frac{10}{3}\pi$$

and the roots (nodes) are at:

$$x=\frac{2k}{3}\pi,\,\frac{5}{3}(2k+1)\pi$$ where $$k\in\mathbb{Z}$$

Here is a plot of the function over one period:

View attachment 1286

The nodes for this period are at:

$$x=0,\,\frac{2}{3}\pi,\,\frac{4}{3}\pi,\,\frac{5}{3}\pi,\,2\pi,\,\frac{8}{3}\pi,\,\frac{10}{3}\pi,\,$$

So far , so good. To find the anti-nodes, we obviously want to equate the derivative with respect to $x$ of the given waveform to zero:

$$y_2'(x)=\frac{6}{5}\cos\left(\frac{6}{5}x \right)+\frac{9}{5}\cos\left(\frac{9}{5}x \right)=0$$

Multiplying through by $$\frac{5}{3}$$ and letting $$u=\frac{3}{5}x$$ we obtain:

$$2\cos\left(2u \right)+3\cos\left(3u \right)=0$$

At the moment, I can't think of a nice clean way to solve this trigonometric equation, but perhaps someone else will know of a method.

Using double and triple angle identities for cosine and letting $v=\cos(u)$, we then get:

$$12v^3+4v^2-9v-2=0$$

We could obtain exact values for the roots of this cubic, but I find such methods cumbersome, and then we are left to take the inverse cosine function of these roots anyway, so I suggest we approximate the roots.

Using a numeric root finding method, we find:

$$v\approx-0.941785319480139,\,-0.214929385113036,\,0.823381371259841$$

Back-substituting, where $$x=\frac{5}{3}\cos^{-1}(v)$$, we then find:

$$x\approx1.00575387440944,\,2.979026418974480,\,4.66449632903117$$

By the symmetry of the wave form about $$x=\frac{5}{3}\pi$$, we may then give the other anti-nodes in the plotted period as:

$$x\approx5.80747918293481,\,7.492949092991497,\,9.466221637556537$$
 

Attachments

  • tristancohn.jpg
    tristancohn.jpg
    6 KB · Views: 91
MarkFL said:
Back-substituting, where $$x=\frac{5}{3}\cos^{-1}(v)$$, we then find:

$$x\approx1.00575387440944,\,2.979026418974480,\,4.66449632903117$$

By the symmetry of the wave form about $$x=\frac{5}{3}\pi$$, we may then give the other anti-nodes in the plotted period as:

$$x\approx5.80747918293481,\,7.492949092991497,\,9.466221637556537$$

Thanks, I don't really understand how you back-substitute x though.
 
I took the approximations for $v$ and used $$x=\frac{5}{3}\cos^{-1}(v)$$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top