COVID Any hypothesized cases of long covid subtle enough to be undiagnosed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter syfry
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Covid-19
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the potential for undetected long COVID cases characterized by subtle symptoms that may be overlooked. Participants note that long COVID is defined by the persistence of negative symptoms following an initial COVID-19 infection, and typically manifests with clear symptoms. However, there is acknowledgment that some individuals may experience long COVID after being asymptomatic during their initial infection, later developing new health issues. The conversation draws parallels to flu cases, where many infections go unnoticed due to mild or absent symptoms, suggesting that similar patterns could exist with long COVID. The possibility of mild symptoms, such as a slight loss of smell, going undiagnosed is raised, along with the idea that these symptoms could be mistaken for normal aging or unrelated health issues. Overall, the thread highlights the need for further research into the spectrum of long COVID symptoms and the potential for subtle cases to be recognized.
syfry
Messages
172
Reaction score
21
TL;DR Summary
People get covid without symptoms. And people get long covid. So are any researchers voicing the possibility for long covid with subtle symptoms that potentially get overlooked?
Wondering what discussions on that possibility (of a so far undetected long covid) anyone might've seen.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
syfry said:
TL;DR Summary: People get covid without symptoms. And people get long covid. So are any researchers voicing the possibility for long covid with subtle symptoms that potentially get overlooked?

Wondering what discussions on that possibility (of a so far undetected long covid) anyone might've seen.
Considering the fact that symptoms run from 'none' to 'death', I'm guessing that the list of symptoms already runs the gamut, so I'm confused as to what you are asking.

Your topic title hints at the situation like the 'Ohio Covid Pooper'.
Now THAT would be a thread I would love to watch.
 
syfry said:
So are any researchers voicing the possibility for long covid with subtle symptoms that potentially get overlooked?
As I understand it, "long covid" is, BY DEFINTION, the long term retention of negative symptoms that manifest themselves. If you are showing no symptoms, you don't HAVE long covid.

The condition you describe does not seem to me to be impossible, but it is NOT what is described by the phrase "long covid".
 
FWIW:
Long COVID is one of the dumbed down names for 'post Covid sequelae' - so you can see why they renamed it to something non-medical people can deal with.

Long COVID is symptoms -often unlike what the patient experienced earlier -- and disease processes that appear well after first symptoms are gone. Some few symptoms may persist from the start to well after the initial infection. Example: anosmia is total loss of sense of smell and very obvious when it persists.. So like most pathologies it presents with varying symptoms among patients from the start through Long COVID.

Long COVID does not appear in every patient. Some long COVID patients were aysmptomatic with positive PCR tests, then some weeks later they developed a whole new group of problems.

See: https://byjus.com/biology/difference-between-exons-and-introns/
For a more detailed explanation.
 
Thanks for the replies. My question is about magnitude of symptoms. It's true that long covid is named for obvious symptoms, and a definition doesn't always cover the entire range of possibilities.

As an example, before 2014 we might've defined the flu (influenza) by including the symptoms we'd expect people to feel.

But by then a study of over 5,000 people had discovered that a lot of flu cases went unnoticed because of either zero or mild symptoms:

Fever, muscle aches, nausea — these are what we usually associate with having the flu.

But just because you don't exhibit these symptoms, it doesn't mean you don't have the flu, researchers say. And you could be just as contagious. In fact, their study found that roughly three-quarters of people with seasonal or pandemic flu show either no symptoms or mild ones that aren't usually linked to flu.

People often mistake the flu for the common cold, Hayward tells Shots. "A lot of the time you may just have a runny nose, a bit of a cough, perhaps a sore throat," he says. But the classic flu symptoms of a sudden fever and muscle aches — "the study shows that that very often doesn't happen. And it's often a much more mild illness."

Roughly 1 in 5 unvaccinated people was infected with the flu virus each winter, the study found, but only a quarter of those people showed any symptoms of the infection. And only 17 percent of those infected were sick enough to see a doctor.

Yet the only medical dictionary that I could find online is still defining the flu by expected symptoms, without mention that most people who have the flu might have zero symptoms. (similarly with its defining of the more official influenza wording)

So for a hypothetical example to what my question is about, if anosmia were to include a milder 20% loss of smell, or a low enough loss that most people wouldn't notice, then that aspect might go undiagnosed, but also maybe some researchers have already voiced the possibility.

jim mcnamara pointed out long covid could start without symptoms and then develop a whole new set of issues. Now what I'm wondering is, has anyone heard about any researchers hypothesizing a long covid with mild enough symptoms that might get mistaken either for the normal aches and pains of aging, or as being seemingly unrelated.
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
42
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top