JaredJames
- 2,818
- 22
lisab said:So what would happen if 2 Canucks and 2 Brits arrive at a 4-way-stop intersection, all at the same time?
We've got a major problem on our hands!
This discussion centers on the annoyance and disdain for certain phrases and words commonly used in everyday language and business jargon. Participants express frustration with terms such as "good job," "you need to be flexible," and "work smarter, not harder," highlighting their implications and the redundancy in phrases like "redundant redundancy." The conversation also critiques incorrect pronunciations and grammatical errors, such as "should of" instead of "should have," and the misuse of terms like "irregardless." Overall, the thread serves as a humorous yet critical examination of language misuse in both personal and professional contexts.
PREREQUISITESLanguage enthusiasts, communication professionals, and anyone interested in improving their understanding of business language and its social implications.
lisab said:So what would happen if 2 Canucks and 2 Brits arrive at a 4-way-stop intersection, all at the same time?
jarednjames said:Seconded.
That and "aluminum" - I know it's not strictly wrong, but is there really a need for it?
1MileCrash said:"rubric" is a hated word of mine.
mugaliens said:What? "Al-u-min-i-um?" It's the pronunciation of words like that which builds those "stiff upper lip" muscles.
jarednjames said:Well you've got Aluminium and Aluminum. I'm yet to hear Aluminum used outside of the US (not saying it isn't, just never heard it).
I just don't see why there is a need for there to be two different versions of the word.
lisab said:So what would happen if 2 Canucks and 2 Brits arrive at a 4-way-stop intersection, all at the same time?
Galteeth said:I hate when people order food or something and are asking how much it costs and they say "What's the damage?"
When I used to deliver pizza I would always be tempted to respond with "to your brain or mine?"
Danger said:Unless they are exactly equal in their arrival times, which is physically impossible, we would follow the traffic regulations.
1MileCrash said:Not to digress but, why is that impossible? I thought time was not infinitely divisible (planck time)?
Although a sentence I actually like in response,Pythagorean said:"if you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem"
turbo-1 said:Know anybody that has to say "utilize" instead of "use" every time? You are dealing with a pompous poser.
Well, I'm glad that we finally got to the bottom of that mystery.lisab said:Oh, that reminds me of one that makes me crazy!
turbo-1 said:Know anybody that has to say "utilize" instead of "use" every time? You are dealing with a pompous poser.
turbo-1 said:There is no "I" in team.
GeorginaS said:"Please respond to myself", and I want to smack you upside the head for saying that.
Jack21222 said:It actually means quite the opposite...
turbo-1 said:Know anybody that has to say "utilize" instead of "use" every time? You are dealing with a pompous poser.
Chi Meson said:And I could see the wheels spinning for a while.
Yes, sadly, no one else was around. :(Danger said:
I so love it when that happens, but always regret when it happens without an appreciative audience.
GeorginaS said:Add to that: anyone who refers to themselves as "myself" when they aren't talking about themselves being alone. "I am by myself" is fine. "Please respond to myself", and I want to smack you upside the head for saying that.
mugaliens said:How about "I'm standing beside myself..."
lisab said:Right, so then it's settled. Aluminum it is. In the interest of efficiency, of course.