Anyone have a good Physics Book?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the search for advanced physics books that delve into mathematical explanations, particularly in areas like quantum mechanics, string theory, and nuclear/particle physics. Participants note that while many popular physics books provide intriguing insights, they often lack the rigorous mathematical framework desired. It is suggested that a solid foundation in conventional physics topics such as mechanics, thermodynamics, and astrophysics is essential before tackling more complex subjects like superstring theory. Recommendations include "Quantum Mechanics for Scientists and Engineers," "Quantum Kinetic Theory and Application," and "The Physics of Quantum Information," along with "Basic Ideas and Concepts in Nuclear Physics" for a more accessible introduction. The Feynman Lectures on Physics and older editions of Resnick & Halliday are also mentioned as valuable resources for those with some calculus knowledge.
derek.basler
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
I've read a lot of the "popular" physics book, i.e. Brief History of Time, Relativity, Elegant Universe, etc. I want something more, perhaps explaining why things work with math and what not. Maybe not so popular, yet intriguing none the less. Does anyone have any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Physics is a pretty broad topic... And unless you're looking for a mathematical overview of a lot of basic physics topics (mechanics, thermo, electricity), it doesn't sound like you're interested in a physics textbook. Most of the books I've seen that aren't afraid to get into the mathematics of situations are pretty specialized, such as Quantum Mechanics or Stellar Structure.

Your mathematical background as well as any specific topics you may be interested in will greatly help to find a book that will will enjoy.
 
well id like Quantum mechanics, but mostly string theory and things along that line. even nuclear/particle physics.
 
String theory, and "things along that line" are extremely intense mathematical theories. If you're looking for a more underlying, rigorous explanation of some of the ideas presented in say, Greene's elegant universe, I believe you'd have to spend years studying in the university to get to that point.
 
I agree with Nabeshin.

I would recommend that you start looking into conventional physics (mechanics, thermo, or astro) first before trying to read texts (not the popular novel, but actually text) on superstring theory. Quantum mechanics wise, all the books I have are pretty advance in terms of the mathematics. But my suggestions would be Quantum Mechanics for scientists and engineers, Quantum Kinetic Theory and Application (vasko), and the Physics of Quantum Information (Ekert, Zeilinger)

Basic Ideas and Concepts in Nuclear Physics (K. Hyde) is a relatively easy text for nuclear.
 
At the risk of sounding like a broken record...

The Feynman Lectures on Physics

If you have a some calculus under your belt. Also, old editions of Resnick & Halliday from the 60s or 70s.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top