Anyone use a Mac and Lightroom or Aperture or PS?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saladsamurai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mac
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the management of photo libraries on Mac systems, specifically comparing iPhoto, Lightroom, and Aperture. Users unanimously agree that iPhoto and its library can be removed when using Adobe Lightroom, as they consume unnecessary space and complicate photo organization. The consensus is that using Finder alongside Photoshop provides a more streamlined and efficient workflow for photo management. Lightroom is favored for its superior organizational capabilities compared to iPhoto and Aperture.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with Adobe Lightroom for photo management
  • Understanding of macOS file management using Finder
  • Basic knowledge of photo editing with Adobe Photoshop
  • Awareness of iPhoto and Aperture functionalities
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore advanced features of Adobe Lightroom for photo organization
  • Learn about optimizing storage management on macOS
  • Investigate alternative photo management tools beyond iPhoto and Aperture
  • Research best practices for integrating Finder with Adobe Photoshop
USEFUL FOR

Mac users, photographers, and digital asset managers looking to optimize their photo management workflow using Adobe Lightroom and Finder.

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7
I am just wondering: I have all of my photos in the iPhoto library, but I just (finally) installed my copy of Adobe Lightroom. I am going to import all of my photos to Lightroom and I am wondering if there is any need to keep iPhoto on my computer.

Any Mac users out there who can offer any advice on how you manage your photos?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
You don't need to keep iPhoto (or its library, which will take up much more space than just the application itself) regardless of whether or not you have Lightroom.

I just use Finder. iPhoto mucks things up too much in its "database" and I don't approve of how Aperture does basically the same thing. Finder and Photoshop work well for me.
 
fss said:
You don't need to keep iPhoto (or its library, which will take up much more space than just the application itself) regardless of whether or not you have Lightroom.

I just use Finder. iPhoto mucks things up too much in its "database" and I don't approve of how Aperture does basically the same thing. Finder and Photoshop work well for me.

Sounds good then! So Aperture attempts to "organize" things like iPhoto does? So it's maybe a good thing that I went with Lightroom then. I am not sure what it attempts to do with the photos as far as organization is concerned.

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 104 ·
4
Replies
104
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
92K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K