Anyone Watch Fringe - Mysterious Equation

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter erok81
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fringe watch
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a mathematical equation featured in the TV show Fringe, specifically focusing on its components, implications, and potential connections to well-known mathematical concepts such as the Gamma function and the Riemann zeta function. The conversation includes exploratory reasoning about the equation's significance and its portrayal in popular media.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes the equation involves the Gamma function and expresses curiosity about its implications when solved with zero.
  • Another participant identifies the Gamma function as an extension of the factorial function to real and complex numbers.
  • Some participants question the relevance of the Gamma function in a television show, suggesting it may have been chosen for aesthetic reasons rather than mathematical accuracy.
  • One participant argues that the equation cannot equal zero for any value of s, except at the poles of the Gamma function.
  • A participant mentions that if the denominator were altered, the equation could define the Riemann zeta function, linking it to the Riemann hypothesis.
  • Another participant suggests that the equation is likely intended to represent the zeta function.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the significance and accuracy of the equation presented in the show. There is no consensus on its relevance or correctness, and multiple competing interpretations are present.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the potential for misunderstanding due to the fictional context of the equation, and there are unresolved questions regarding the implications of the Gamma function and the conditions under which the equation might equal zero.

erok81
Messages
454
Reaction score
0
So I was watching Fringe this morning and this came up. Then the character ominously solved it with a zero. I could solve the integral but there is a symbol that appears in the beginning that I am not familiar with. Plus, with the emphasis on him solving it with zero, maybe this is a famous equation and something bad happens when it equals zero. :smile:

Here is the formula in question (the best I can see it anyway).

[tex]n(s)=\frac{1}{\Gamma (s)} \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{x^{s-1}}{e^{x}+1}dx[/tex]

And here is a screen shot of his notepad. Which includes a few other things.
 

Attachments

  • fringe.jpg
    fringe.jpg
    17.7 KB · Views: 549
Mathematics news on Phys.org
[tex]\Gamma (s)[/tex] is the Gamma function, which is an extension of the factorial function to the reals and complex numbers.
 
Wtf is the gamma function doing on fox?
 
pergradus said:
Wtf is the gamma function doing on fox?
Satisfying a recursion formula I suppose :rolleyes:
 
Sounds like they just picked something that looked cool. I was hoping for an actual something, but I guess not. :redface:
 
You can easily show that the equation cannot be 0 for any value of s, because the integrand is always non-zero. The only exception is for the poles of the gamma function (s=0, -1, -2...).

By the way, if e^x+1 were instead e^x-1, n(s) would be a definition of the Riemann zeta function. The previous line is R(s)>1/2, which makes me think this has something to do with the Riemann hypothesis.
 
It's probably supposed to be the zeta function.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
973
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K