Anyone Watch Fringe - Mysterious Equation

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter erok81
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fringe watch
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 3K views
erok81
Messages
454
Reaction score
0
So I was watching Fringe this morning and this came up. Then the character ominously solved it with a zero. I could solve the integral but there is a symbol that appears in the beginning that I am not familiar with. Plus, with the emphasis on him solving it with zero, maybe this is a famous equation and something bad happens when it equals zero. :smile:

Here is the formula in question (the best I can see it anyway).

[tex]n(s)=\frac{1}{\Gamma (s)} \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{x^{s-1}}{e^{x}+1}dx[/tex]

And here is a screen shot of his notepad. Which includes a few other things.
 

Attachments

  • fringe.jpg
    fringe.jpg
    17.7 KB · Views: 561
Mathematics news on Phys.org
[tex]\Gamma (s)[/tex] is the Gamma function, which is an extension of the factorial function to the reals and complex numbers.
 
Wtf is the gamma function doing on fox?
 
pergradus said:
Wtf is the gamma function doing on fox?
Satisfying a recursion formula I suppose :rolleyes:
 
Sounds like they just picked something that looked cool. I was hoping for an actual something, but I guess not. :redface:
 
You can easily show that the equation cannot be 0 for any value of s, because the integrand is always non-zero. The only exception is for the poles of the gamma function (s=0, -1, -2...).

By the way, if e^x+1 were instead e^x-1, n(s) would be a definition of the Riemann zeta function. The previous line is R(s)>1/2, which makes me think this has something to do with the Riemann hypothesis.
 
It's probably supposed to be the zeta function.