Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the appropriateness of a tutor writing in a student's math book, particularly one that is new and unmarked. Participants share their personal experiences and opinions regarding writing in books, the implications of such actions, and the responsibilities of both tutors and students in these situations.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- One participant expresses frustration over a tutor writing in their new math book, questioning the tutor's reasoning.
- Another suggests that the cost of the book should be deducted from the tutor's pay.
- Some participants share their own habits regarding writing in books, with one noting the value of margin notes from previous readers.
- A participant recounts a negative experience with a student writing in a book they lent, questioning the rationale behind such actions.
- There is a suggestion that instructors may have valid reasons for lending books to students, based on personal experiences.
- One participant humorously reflects on their transition from studying STEM subjects to accountancy, indicating a sense of disorientation.
- Another participant speculates that the tutor may not be a legitimate tutor but rather a representative from a textbook company aiming to reduce the resale market.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express a range of opinions on the appropriateness of writing in books, with no clear consensus on whether the tutor's actions were justified. Some defend the practice of writing in books, while others strongly oppose it, indicating a division in viewpoints.
Contextual Notes
Participants reference personal experiences and varying attitudes towards book ownership and respect for property, which may influence their perspectives on the issue.