Ap physics 1 velocity center of mass question

AI Thread Summary
In an inelastic collision, adding mass to one block does affect the center of mass (CM) velocity of the system. The discussion highlights a scenario where a disk collides with a block, illustrating that the CM velocity depends on the masses and velocities of the colliding objects. Two cases are presented to demonstrate how the CM velocity remains constant before and after the collision, despite changes in mass distribution. The key takeaway is that while the CM velocity can change with mass adjustments, it remains consistent during the collision itself. Understanding these principles clarifies the relationship between mass, velocity, and the center of mass in collision scenarios.
ldkdkdjdj
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Can anyone explain how if you add mass to one block colliding with another in an inelastic system, the center of mass velocity of the system changes? Doesn’t the center of mass velocity of a system only change if there is a net external force? In that case the force are equal and opposite, so center of mass velocity of the system doesn’t change, no?
Relevant Equations
Idk
Idk
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ldkdkdjdj said:
if you add mass to one block colliding with another in an inelastic system, the center of mass velocity of the system changes?
Does it? Perhaps you need to define the situation more clearly.
 
haruspex said:
Does it? Perhaps you need to define the situation more clearly.
From the 2021 physics 1 test:
(c) The disk is now moving at a constant speed v on the surface (frictionless) toward a block of mass Mg, which is at rest on the surface, as shown above. The disk and block collide head-on and stick together, and the center of mass of the disk-block system moves with speed Vcm

i. Suppose the mass of the disk is much greater than the mass of the block. Estimate the velocity of the center of mass of the disk-block system. Explain how you arrived at your prediction without deriving it mathematically.
 
It seems that you are confusing the constancy of the velocity of the CM during a collision with the dependence of the velocity of the CM on the velocity and mass of the colliding objects. For example
Case I
You have equal masses 6 kg each moving towards each other at 2 m/s. The velocity of the center of mass is $$V_{cm}=\frac{6~(\text{kg})\times 2~(\text{m/s})+6~(\text{kg})\times (-2)~(\text{m/s})}{6~(\text{kg})+6~(\text{kg})}=\frac{12~(\text{kg}\cdot\text{m/s})-12~(\text{kg}\cdot\text{m/s})}{12~(\text{kg})}=0~\text{m/s}.$$Case II
You move 2 kg from one mass to the other keeping the velocities the same. The velocity of the center of mass is $$V_{cm}=\frac{8~(\text{kg})\times 2~(\text{m/s})+4~(\text{kg})\times (-2)~(\text{m/s})}{6~(\text{kg})+6~(\text{kg})}=\frac{16~(\text{kg}\cdot\text{m/s})-8~(\text{kg}\cdot\text{m/s})}{12~(\text{kg})}=\frac{2}{3}~\text{m/s}.$$Of course, in each case the velocity of the center of mass after the collision is the same as before the collision. Here you are asked to estimate the velocity of the CM if most, i.e. almost all but not quite, of the mass is moved from one object to the other.
 
Last edited:
Ohh that makes more sense now, tysmm
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top