Applicability of Coleman-Mandula Theorem?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter strangerep
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Coleman-Mandula theorem (C-M theorem) is primarily established through proofs in the original paper and in Weinberg's Volume III, both of which adhere to orthodox axiomatic Quantum Field Theory (QFT). There is speculation regarding the applicability of the C-M theorem in alternative formulations of QFT. A reference to an additional proof can be found on arXiv, specifically at http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9605147. The discussion emphasizes that various formulations of QFT are considered equivalent, although some may be more suitable for specific problems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Field Theory (QFT)
  • Familiarity with the Coleman-Mandula theorem
  • Knowledge of axiomatic approaches in physics
  • Experience with academic research and arXiv resources
NEXT STEPS
  • Research alternative proofs of the Coleman-Mandula theorem on arXiv
  • Explore the implications of the C-M theorem in non-orthodox QFT formulations
  • Study the equivalence of various QFT formulations for problem-solving
  • Examine Weinberg's Volume III for detailed insights into axiomatic QFT
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in Quantum Field Theory, and students seeking to deepen their understanding of the Coleman-Mandula theorem and its implications across different QFT formulations.

strangerep
Science Advisor
Messages
3,766
Reaction score
2,214
The only proofs of the C-M thm I know of are the original paper,
and the one in Weinberg Vol-III. Both essentially come under the
scope of (orthodox) axiomatic QFT.

I've heard vaguely that C-M thm (or something like it) also applies
within other formulations of QFT. If that's right, can anyone here
suggest references?

TIA,

- strangerep.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's another proof on arXiv, probably similar to the others:
http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9605147

Various formulations of QFT are supposed to be equivalent. Some are easier to use for some problems than others, but they are supposed to be equivalent.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 91 ·
4
Replies
91
Views
9K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
9K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K