Applications of Resonance in Weaponry?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the potential applications of resonance in weaponry, specifically the feasibility of weaponizing resonance to incapacitate individuals. Participants assert that while directed sound can harm individuals, it affects all within the targeted area rather than being finely tuned to specific individuals. The conversation also touches on the limitations of using acoustic weapons, such as those deployed in Iraq, and suggests that while directional pulsed sound is challenging to implement, microwave technology may offer a more precise method by resonating water molecules in the body. However, ethical and legal constraints exist regarding such applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of resonance principles in physics
  • Familiarity with acoustic weaponry and its historical applications
  • Knowledge of microwave technology and its effects on biological tissues
  • Awareness of international conventions regarding weaponized technologies
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the physics of resonance and its implications in weaponry
  • Explore existing literature on acoustic weapons and their effectiveness
  • Investigate the use of microwave technology in non-lethal weaponry
  • Review international laws and ethical considerations surrounding weaponized resonance
USEFUL FOR

Writers, physicists, military strategists, and anyone interested in the intersection of physics and weapon technology.

saw_tooth
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I apologize for the simplicity of this question. I am not a physics student but am an aspiring author and am developing a fictional story outline that will include applications of resonance (specifically the ability to move, levitate, or destroy objects using resonance). I am trying to stay as true to laws of physics as possible while making the applications integrate well into the storyline.

My specific question is, can the idea of resonance be weaponized (is this an acoustical weapon such as those deployed recently in Iraq)? Can weaponized resonance be "tuned" to affect the "frequency" of a specific person? In other words, is it theoretically possible to develop a weapon that could use resonance to incapacitate an individual and have the weapon be able to automatically adjust the frequency needed to be "resonant" with multiple individuals at once or instantly from one individual to the next?

I apologize in advance if this is a naive or overly simple question. I just want as firm a grasp of the idea of resonance and its applications specific to the story as possible. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can weaponized resonance be "tuned" to affect the "frequency" of a specific person?
I doubt that. Humans are not tuning forks. You can harm humans with (directed) sound, but it will affect all in the targeted region.
 
My specific question is, can the idea of resonance be weaponized (is this an acoustical weapon such as those deployed recently in Iraq)? Can weaponized resonance be "tuned" to affect the "frequency" of a specific person? In other words, is it theoretically possible to develop a weapon that could use resonance to incapacitate an individual and have the weapon be able to automatically adjust the frequency needed to be "resonant" with multiple individuals at once or instantly from one individual to the next?

Very unlikely as we are all about the same size and shape. I suppose it might be possible to exploit the size difference between children and adults?

Google can easily find papers on Acoustic Weapons..

http://www.scribd.com/doc/2582436/Acoustic-Weapons

Directional pulsed sound might also be a possibility but very hard to make narrow beams due to the long wavelength of sound.

Now if you were to use microwaves you might be be able to make directional beams and fry someone by resonating the water molecules in their body but there are international conventions on this stuff.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
816
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K