What is the Equation for Determining the Resonant Frequency of a Drum Shell?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter SIMON1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drum Resonance Shell
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the resonant frequency of a drum shell, focusing on the complexities involved in modeling an acoustic drum kit. Participants explore various factors that influence the sound, including the drum's physical dimensions, materials, and environmental conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks an equation to determine the resonant frequency of a drum shell based on its dimensions, acknowledging the complexity of sound production.
  • Another participant questions whether the focus should be on the flexural modes of the cylinder's walls or the modes of air within the cylinder, highlighting the importance of boundary conditions.
  • A participant notes that major drum manufacturers typically do not rely on first-principles calculations for modeling drums, suggesting a sample-based approach instead.
  • Humidity's effect on both the drum head and shell is mentioned as a significant factor, particularly for wooden drums.
  • Concerns are raised about the multitude of variables affecting sound, including the choice of sticks, drum head tension, and the presence of snares in snare drums.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the applicability of a simple equation based solely on depth and diameter for calculating resonant frequency.
  • There is a suggestion that the flexural modes are complex and dependent on the model (thin wall vs. thick wall) and boundary conditions.
  • A participant shares a resource for further reading but also expresses difficulty in accessing it, indicating a need for simpler methods to estimate resonant frequency without extensive mathematical complexity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to determine the resonant frequency, with multiple competing views on the factors and models to consider. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific equations or methods to use.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the limitations of their approaches, including the potential complexity of mathematical models and the influence of various physical factors on sound production. There is also mention of a project timeline that may restrict the depth of analysis.

SIMON1
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi there I am currently doing a major thesis on the procedural generation of an acoustic drum kit, using PD (puredata). Now what I am actually doing is physically modelling the drum kit piece by piece, starting with the drum shell. I know that every aspect of the drum contributes to its complex sound and is not dominated by a single factor, for example the the batter head & resonant head exciting resonant frequencies, the depth & diameter of the drum determining the pitch and amplitude of the drum, also the lugs, sticks and bass hole (on a bass drum) all adding to the very complex sound that is perceived as one singular sound.
They are not the problem in this equation but finding the resonant frequency the shell is to start the workings of the kit, now damping occurs by the density of the wood of course and all the other factors but the question i propose is; what equation can i do to determine a cylinders resonant frequency if their is given dimensions for that specific drum? Then to work out the rest of the equation once the other factors have been added?

I know only basics of physics but I am certainly a quick learner. I just haven't found anything online that could point me in the right direction.

Any help on this matter would be greatly appreciated & I would be happy to forward the paper onto the site as well for critique and analysis for whom may be interested.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It will depend on what kind of modes are you looking at. Are these the flexural modes of the cylinder's walls or the modes of the air in cylinder?
The boundary conditions will matter too.
 
SIMON1 said:
Hi there I am currently doing a major thesis on the procedural generation of an acoustic drum kit, using PD (puredata). <snip>

Good luck with that- have you done any research at all into how the major manufacturers (Roland, Yamaha, etc) model drums? Hint- it's not based on first-principles calculations of resonant frequencies.
 
Not a physicist but am a drummer who has done some work with acoustics. You also need to factor in humidity for the drum head and for the drum shell if it is wood. There are also metal shells which will respond much less to likely levels of humidity. Also in a snare drum the snares add their own frequencies.

How will you determine your "sound" for test purposes? The tightening of lugs and choice of sticks (some with nylon tips for instance) and the head itself all impact the sound and there is no single sound but there are desired effects, such as crisp or more dull. There a large number of variables here.
 
It will depend on what kind of modes are you looking at. Are these the flexural modes of the cylinder's walls or the modes of the air in cylinder?
The boundary conditions will matter too.

The flexural modes of the cylinder walls and the modes of the air in the cylinder preferably the equation to determine all, the process I am researching is to model the cylinder (drum shell) as one medium and then to incorporate the remaining features of the drum after. there was an equation that I came across that only took into account the dimensions of the drum shell being that of depth & diameter but I am not sure if that would be correct to use as the resonant frequency of the shell?
 
Good luck with that- have you done any research at all into how the major manufacturers (Roland, Yamaha, etc) model drums? Hint- it's not based on first-principles calculations of resonant frequencies. -

I read a small amount and gathered that they are mainly sample based, with numerous variables added in behaviour modelling to give the player a more realistic feel. For the purpose of the project is to mimic that of an acoustic drum kit using solely procedural generated audio, the approach I have took is to physically model the kit including every variable from scratch, thus being very difficult but not impossible. To some extent this is a proposed question that does that need to be successful it is the process that counts and is marked accordingly.
 
BG1 said:
How will you determine your "sound" for test purposes? The tightening of lugs and choice of sticks (some with nylon tips for instance) and the head itself all impact the sound and there is no single sound but there are desired effects, such as crisp or more dull. There a large number of variables here.

The variables that I have chosen to model are the basics first and then to dwell on more complicated matters afterwards. The shell, head, snare wires, depth & diameter, being the most important to achieve here first. I am well aware of the variables on the overall sound but as previously stated there is a tolerance on the project to be deemed successful, the test purposes will be a listening test to drummers as well as an audience of audio students. Upon reviews of the project we have spoken about reaching a point that exceeds ability and the timescale given but ideally i would like to add all variables for tuning and selection of sticks etc.
 
nasu said:
It will depend on what kind of modes are you looking at. Are these the flexural modes of the cylinder's walls or the modes of the air in cylinder?
The boundary conditions will matter too.

The flexural modes of the cylinder walls and the modes of the air in the cylinder preferably the equation to determine all, the process I am researching is to model the cylinder (drum shell) as one medium and then to incorporate the remaining features of the drum after. there was an equation that I came across that only took into account the dimensions of the drum shell being that of depth & diameter but I am not sure if that would be correct to use as the resonant frequency of the shell?
 
SIMON1 said:
It will depend on what kind of modes are you looking at. Are these the flexural modes of the cylinder's walls or the modes of the air in cylinder?
The boundary conditions will matter too.

The flexural modes of the cylinder walls and the modes of the air in the cylinder preferably the equation to determine all, the process I am researching is to model the cylinder (drum shell) as one medium and then to incorporate the remaining features of the drum after. there was an equation that I came across that only took into account the dimensions of the drum shell being that of depth & diameter but I am not sure if that would be correct to use as the resonant frequency of the shell?

The flexural modes are not simple, as a simple formula. And it will depend on model (thin wall, thick wall) and boundary condition.
You can start with this paper, maybe, to get an idea to what are you getting into:
http://pme.sagepub.com/content/167/1/62.full.pdf+html
 
  • #10
nasu said:
The flexural modes are not simple, as a simple formula. And it will depend on model (thin wall, thick wall) and boundary condition.
You can start with this paper, maybe, to get an idea to what are you getting into:
http://pme.sagepub.com/content/167/1/62.full.pdf+html

I couldn't access that paper directly but i did find this one in comparison: http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/royprsa/197/1049/238.full.pdf - you are right it definitely is not simple! My supervisor on the project has stated that their are certain routes which would include too much maths & physics, and to choose a different route that wouldn't lead to the project timeline being majorly based on equations from physics & maths. I am getting help with maths from stepmother but its physics I am struggling with, if we can forget about the flexural modes for a minute, is there a method that does not include total accuracy but yet could still be used to determine the resonant frequency, given we had a tolerance?
 
  • #11
SIMON1 said:
I couldn't access that paper directly but i did find this one in comparison: http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/royprsa/197/1049/238.full.pdf - you are right it definitely is not simple! My supervisor on the project has stated that their are certain routes which would include too much maths & physics, and to choose a different route that wouldn't lead to the project timeline being majorly based on equations from physics & maths. I am getting help with maths from stepmother but its physics I am struggling with, if we can forget about the flexural modes for a minute, is there a method that does not include total accuracy but yet could still be used to determine the resonant frequency, given we had a tolerance?
You may be able to find and use the results of these complicated calculations, without actually doing the calculations.
 
  • #12
http://facweb.cs.depaul.edu/sgrais/DrumMakerproposal3_drum_shells.htm

ccyl.gif


L = (c / 4f) - (0.61r)

L represents the length of the shell, c represents the speed of sound within the given medium (wood, metal, etc.), and f represents the frequency of the drumhead's fundamental. Also, this equation takes account of the fact that the reflection of standing sound waves within the shell does not take place precisely at the end, but slightly beyond. Stopped pipes, therefore, act slightly longer than they truly are, so r, representing the radius of the end of the tube, is used in "end correction," a process of making up for this anomaly of "acting" length.

The fact that the stopped pipe resonates when it is only one fourth of the wavelength of the sound which sets it to vibrating is particularly useful in the practice of building drums. A pipe open on both ends would have to be twice as long as a stopped pipe to resonate the same fundamental.

Another useful attribute of the stopped pipe is its natural tendency to strengthen the fundamental. Since a stopped pipe only resonates at odd-numbered partials, one half of all the overtones do not receive any of its benefits, so the fundamental, already somewhat stronger than the rest, is further reinforced.

Therefore, through vibrating sympathetically with a drumhead, each shell strengthens the fundamental both by its own resonance as well as its omission of one half of all overtones in that resonance.
- so this makes sense to me but yet is it accurate enough say a 22 inch in depth bass drum the resonant frequency is 150.3 Hz?
 
  • #13
nasu said:
You may be able to find and use the results of these complicated calculations, without actually doing the calculations.

That would be great I am trying to gain access into that paper through my uni just now see how it goes hopefully I can as you get the results without doing the hard part lol
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
24K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
10K