Applying Gauss's Lemma to Calculate Legendre Symbol (6/13)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around applying Gauss's Lemma in number theory to calculate the Legendre symbol \(\left( \frac{6}{13} \right)\). Participants are exploring the definitions and implications of Gauss's Lemma as presented in the book by Ireland and Rosen.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand how to apply Gauss's Lemma in the context of the Legendre symbol, specifically questioning the definitions provided in their textbook. Other participants inquire about the specific values of \(a\) and \(p\), as well as the implications of the least residue of \(ta\) in this scenario.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants seeking clarification on the definitions and applications of Gauss's Lemma. There is a focus on understanding the parameters involved, and some participants are prompting the original poster to identify suitable values for \(a\) and \(p\) to facilitate the calculation.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of the definitions provided in their textbook, which may not be fully understood by all. There is an emphasis on the need for clarity regarding the terms and setup of the problem.

mathsss2
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Use Gauss Lemma (Number theory) to calculate the Legendre Symbol [tex](\frac{6}{13})[/tex].

I know how to use Gauss Lemma. However we use the book: Ireland and Rosen. They define Gauss Lemma as:

[tex](\frac{a}{p})=(-1)^n[/tex]. They say: Let [tex]\pm m_t[/tex] be the least residue of [tex]ta[/tex], where [tex]m_t[/tex] is positive. As [tex]t[/tex] ranges between 1 and [tex]\frac{(p-1)}{2}[/tex], n is the number of minus signs that occur in this way. I don't understand how to use this form of Gauss's Lemma
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What are [itex]a[/itex] and [itex]p[/itex] in this case? What does that make [itex]\frac{(p-1)}{2}[/itex] ? What does that make the least residue of [itex]ta[/itex] in this case?
 
Could you be more specific, I really do not know how to use this version of Gauss's Lemma. Could you show me some steps on how to start it this way?
 
You want to use the lemma for [itex]\left( \frac{6}{13} \right)[/itex], which means you want an "a" and "p" such that [itex]\left( \frac{a}{p} \right) = \left( \frac{6}{13} \right)[/itex] where "p" is a prime...surely you can think of at least one "a" and one "p" for which this will hold true?
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K