Applying the Borsuk-Ulam theorem to the torus: A helpful hint

  • Thread starter Thread starter qinglong.1397
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Borsuk-Ulam theorem does not hold for the torus, specifically for the mapping f: S^1 × S^1 → ℝ². The discussion references Hatcher's proof for the case of f: S² → ℝ², indicating that while Hatcher's method is applicable, it requires adaptation for the toroidal case. The key takeaway is that the existence of points (x, y) in S^1 × S^1 such that f(x, y) = f(-x, -y) is not guaranteed, contrasting with the behavior observed in higher-dimensional spheres.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Borsuk-Ulam theorem
  • Familiarity with topology, specifically the properties of the torus and spheres
  • Knowledge of continuous mappings in topology
  • Experience with mathematical proofs and theorems in algebraic topology
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Borsuk-Ulam theorem in various topological spaces
  • Explore Hatcher's "Algebraic Topology" for detailed proofs and methodologies
  • Investigate counterexamples to the Borsuk-Ulam theorem in lower dimensions
  • Learn about continuous mappings and their properties in algebraic topology
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of topology, and anyone interested in the applications of the Borsuk-Ulam theorem in various mathematical contexts.

qinglong.1397
Messages
108
Reaction score
1
Please give me some hint!

Homework Statement



Does the Borsuk-Ulam theorem hold for the torus? In other words, for every map [tex]f: S^1\times S^1\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^2[/tex] must there exist [tex](x, y) \in S^1\times S^1[/tex] such that [tex]f(x,y)=f(-x, -y)[/tex]?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


In Hatcher's book, he gave the proof for the map [tex]f: S^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^2[/tex].

For this new problem, I really do not know what to do. It seems that Hatcher's method is useful, but I just do not know how to use it. So, please, tell me some hint. Thank you very much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Here's a hint. It doesn't hold for S^1, does it?
 


Dick said:
Here's a hint. It doesn't hold for S^1, does it?

Thanks for your hint! I know the answer now!:biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K