Applying the FTC to an arbitrary solution of the Schrodinger equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on applying the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (FTC) to the wave function \(\psi(t)\) governed by the Schrödinger equation \(i\dot{\psi} = H\psi\) with a self-adjoint Hamiltonian \(H\). The participant questions whether the continuity of the time-derivative of the wave function is necessary for the FTC to hold. They explore the implications of discontinuities in the wave function, particularly in relation to potentials that may lead to infinite Hamiltonians, such as an uncountable sum of delta functions on the Fat Cantor set. The need for precise definitions regarding these constructs is emphasized.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Schrödinger equation and quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
  • Knowledge of self-adjoint operators in quantum mechanics
  • Concept of delta functions and their applications in potential theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of self-adjoint Hamiltonians in quantum mechanics
  • Study the implications of discontinuities in wave functions
  • Explore the concept of delta functions and their role in quantum potentials
  • Investigate the mathematical rigor behind uncountable sums in functional analysis
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, mathematicians specializing in functional analysis, and students studying advanced quantum mechanics concepts will benefit from this discussion.

AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
Suppose you've got a function [itex]\psi(t)[/itex] that satisfies [itex]i\dot \psi = H \psi[/itex] for some self-adjoint Hamiltonian [itex]H[/itex]. I'd like to apply the fundamental theorem of calculus to this guy and write something like
[tex] \psi(t) - \psi(0) = \int_0^t \psi'(s)ds.[/tex]
Can I do this, given only the very bare conditions I've placed on [itex]\psi[/itex]? Or are there some other things I'd need to assume about [itex]\psi[/itex] to make it kosher?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure about whether the time-derivative of the wave function must be continuous with respect to time; I suspect it does, only because for each energy in the spectrum the associated time dependence is an exponential function, so we're dealing with a linear combination of exponential functions if the energy spectrum is discrete or at worst an integral of an exponential function with respect to dE if the energy spectrum is continuous. So let me talk about space is instead. In order for the fundamental theorem of calculus to fail to apply with respect to position, the set of discontinuities of the derivative must have positive measure. And the derivative of the wavefunction can only be discontinuous at a point if the Hamiltonian is infinite. So to construct a situation where a wavefunction fails to obey the FTC, we could contruct something absurd like a potential that is an uncountable sum of delta functions, so that it is infinite on the Fat Cantor set (so that the wave function becomes something like Volterra's function.
 
lugita15 said:
So to construct a situation where a wavefunction fails to obey the FTC, we could contruct something absurd like a potential that is an uncountable sum of delta functions, so that it is infinite on the Fat Cantor set (so that the wave function becomes something like Volterra's function.
I'm a bit less sanguine about this answer than I was a few months ago. Does anyone know whether the notion of an "uncountable sum of delta functions" can be made precise?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K