Appreciating Our Knowledgeable Forum Members

  • Thread starter Thread starter MikeeMiracle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thanks
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights appreciation for the forum's knowledgeable community and effective moderation, contrasting it with the chaotic nature of Space Science-related Facebook groups that often spread misinformation and personal opinions. Participants express frustration over the lack of moderation in mainstream media, particularly regarding science articles, which can lead to the publication of inaccurate information. The forum is recognized as a reliable source for maintaining informed discussions, restoring a sense of sanity in the face of prevalent misinformation found elsewhere. Overall, the emphasis is on the value of structured, fact-based dialogue in the forum compared to the disorder of social media platforms.
MikeeMiracle
Messages
396
Reaction score
313
I'm feeling the need to thank the members of this forum for being so helpful and knowledgeable and for the admins and moderators who keep everything on track and relevant, it's an amazing learning resource.

I recently joined a number of Space Science related Facebook groups and they are a total mess with misinformation, personal opinion, people making stuff, people attempting to discredit science as it does not fit in with their religious views etc.

It makes me appreciate this forum so much more.

Thanks Everyone :)
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes vanhees71, gentzen, pinball1970 and 19 others
Physics news on Phys.org
MikeeMiracle said:
Facebook groups
1622062498596.png
 
  • Haha
Likes Ibix, hutchphd, DennisN and 2 others
Aside from a few dedicated hobby forums, I stay current by reading several major and a few local digital newspapers including representative moderated reader comments. I remain patient with responses to socio-political articles but lose patience with many responses to technology and science articles.

"Where are the moderators?", one wonders. How can a reputable source allow such drivel be published?

Then I come back to PF, restore sanity and some measure of reality, able to continue the task to remain informed.
 
@Klystron I agree w/ you. I've posted a number of times here on PF about inane "science" statements in seemingly reputable publications (e.g. Time Magazine) and the apparent utter lack of ANY kind of editing much less competent science editing.

I've already posted my opinion of Facebook groups.
 
Thread 'RIP George F. Smoot III (1945-2025)'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Smoot https://physics.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/george-smoot-iii https://apc.u-paris.fr/fr/memory-george-fitzgerald-smoot-iii https://elements.lbl.gov/news/honoring-the-legacy-of-george-smoot/ https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2006/smoot/facts/ https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200611/nobel.cfm https://inspirehep.net/authors/988263 Structure in the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer First-Year Maps (Astrophysical Journal...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
11K
Back
Top