Approximating mac/taylor series to z decimal accuracy

  • Thread starter Thread starter frozenguy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accuracy Series
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on approximating the Maclaurin series for the function tan-1(x) at x=1/2 to three decimal places. The user initially applies the Remainder Estimation Theorem and determines that using terms up to the fifth power is sufficient, but the textbook solution requires the seventh power for four decimal places. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly identifying the cutoff point for series terms to achieve the desired precision, emphasizing the complexity of calculating the (n+1)th derivative for accurate estimations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maclaurin series expansion
  • Familiarity with the Remainder Estimation Theorem
  • Knowledge of calculus, specifically derivatives
  • Proficiency in using series convergence tests
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the Remainder Theorem and its applications in series approximations
  • Learn about the convergence criteria for Taylor series
  • Practice calculating higher-order derivatives for complex functions
  • Explore numerical methods for approximating functions to specified decimal accuracy
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on series approximations, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to Taylor and Maclaurin series.

frozenguy
Messages
186
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Any problem. Ex Use the Mac series of tan^{-1}\left(x\right) to approximate at x=\frac{1}{2} to three decimal place accuracy.

Homework Equations


\sum^{\infty}_{k=0}(-1)^{k}\frac{x^{2k+1}}{2k+1}=x-\frac{x^3}{3}+\frac{x^5}{5}-...

The Attempt at a Solution



I found out using the remainder estimation theorem that all I need is up to the fifth power. So I put x into the expanded series to the fifth power (third term) and then I take three decimal places, rounding the third.
The books answer is four decimal places, fourth rounded and an answer that comes from using the seventh power (fourth term).

So, what am I doing wrong.. I have encountered this on several problems in the book.
Am I using my remainder estimation theorem wrong?

\frac{\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{n+1}}{n+1}<0.0005Using my calculator, I find at n=5, the left side is less then 0.0005
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone able to shed some light?
 
frozenguy - Just look at the terms of the series. At what point will the next sucessive term yield precision beyond your target. That's your cut-off point.

Using the Remainder Estimation therom requires knowledge of the (n+1)th derivative of f(x), something that might be very messy for your function, and will not (in this case) help you solve for the desired value of n (unless you try several trial-by-error cases).

Also, please recall/review, the Remainder Therom is

<br /> R_{n}(x) = \frac{f^{(n+1)}(\xi)}{(n+1)!} \cdot (x-a)^{(n+1)}<br />

where \xi=\xi(x) and here a= 0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K