Are Chocolate Balls the Key to Quantum Cryptography?

  • Thread starter Thread starter brahma
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the trend of researchers using catchy titles for their papers in response to the overwhelming increase in publications, which makes it challenging to attract readers. Participants share examples of intriguing titles, such as "Does Smoothing Matter?" and "For whom the disc tolls," emphasizing the need for attention-grabbing phrases. The conversation also touches on the importance of creativity in titling, with one participant humorously suggesting "Local Pancake Defeats Axis of Evil" as a potential title. Additionally, there is mention of a specific case where a title was altered due to publication standards, illustrating the balance between creativity and adherence to academic norms. Overall, the thread underscores the evolving landscape of academic publishing and the strategies authors employ to stand out.
brahma
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I think due to enormus increase in publications , it is becoming diificult to find readers; so people are giving catchy titles to their papers. I am listing some of them below. I will keep putting more and more titles. I request you to help me in making this list long.

Does Smoothing Matter?
gr-qc/0603010

Elements, topology, and T-shirts
physics/0603026

All roads lead to Rome: Supersolvables and Supercosets
hep-th/9808146

For whom the disc tolls
astro-ph/0510420

And Don't Forget The Black Holes
astro-ph/0510378

How Much Mass do Supermassive Black Holes Eat in their Old Age?
astro-ph/0510369

Message in the Sky
physics/0510102

We Have Evidence for New Physics in the Sky?
hep-th/0510101

Test of patch cosmology with WMAP
astro-ph/0406387

Staging quantum cryptography with chocolate balls
physics/0510050
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Afterall, its necessary to catch the attention of readers.
 
"Quantifying the resource of sharing a reference frame", S.J. vanEnk

Okay, not that funny, but that's because it's not the original title. The author comments read, "Comments: Updated title as PRA did not accept the word “refbit” in the title: PRA accepts neither neologisms (=”a meaningless word coined by a psychotic”, according to Webster), nor novophasms"

Obviously a "never give in" attitude. :smile:
 
Thread 'RIP George F. Smoot III (1945-2025)'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Smoot https://physics.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/george-smoot-iii https://apc.u-paris.fr/fr/memory-george-fitzgerald-smoot-iii https://elements.lbl.gov/news/honoring-the-legacy-of-george-smoot/ https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2006/smoot/facts/ https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200611/nobel.cfm https://inspirehep.net/authors/988263 Structure in the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer First-Year Maps (Astrophysical Journal...
Just ONCE, I wanted to see a post titled Status Update that was not a blatant, annoying spam post by a new member. So here it is. Today was a good day here in Northern Wisconsin. Fall colors are here, no mosquitos, no deer flies, and mild temperature, so my morning run was unusually nice. Only two meetings today, and both went well. The deer that was road killed just down the road two weeks ago is now fully decomposed, so no more smell. Somebody has a spike buck skull for their...
Back
Top