Are Coefficients of Potential Non-Negative?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the non-negativity of coefficients of potential in a system of conductors, specifically questioning whether Pij ≥ 0 can be rigorously proven.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to establish a proof by referencing the relationship between potentials and charges, while some participants question the arrangement of the conductors and the conditions necessary for the proof.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different scenarios and assumptions regarding the arrangement of conductors, with some suggesting specific setups to clarify the problem. There is no explicit consensus yet, but the discussion is progressing with various interpretations being examined.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the need for specific arrangements of conductors to derive results, and some participants highlight the importance of distance between conductors to avoid interaction effects.

N2O2
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I want to prove that coefficients of potential are non-negative. i.e. Pij ≥ 0

Homework Equations



By coefficients of potential method we know that in a system of conductors the potential on ith conductor is related to charges on conductors by:

[itex]\Phi[/itex]i = [itex]\sum[/itex] Pij Qj

The Attempt at a Solution



It is written in Reitz and Milford that it is hard to prove in a rigorous way. I think that we should use Pii ≥ Pij.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
how is the system arranged?
 
This is a general statement. Of course we should set a specific arrangement to obtain a result. for example put Qi on ith conductor and assume jth conductor to be grounded and Q on other conductors to be zero.
But I haven't found the correct conditions.
 
in your scenario, should the conductors be sufficiently a long way away, their potentials will not effect each other (to a certain approximation) hence defeating the equation connecting the potential of one to the charge of another.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K