Are Cooking Fumes Harmful to Your Health?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chirhone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cooking Effects
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Cooking fumes pose significant health risks, including exposure to toxic compounds such as aldehydes, alkanoic acids, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and heterocyclic amines (HCAs). Studies indicate that cooking at high temperatures (up to 300°C) can lead to respiratory issues and an increased risk of cancer, as classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Using high smoke point oils and methods like sous vide can mitigate these risks. Proper ventilation and cooking techniques are essential for reducing harmful exposure.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cooking methods and their temperature effects
  • Knowledge of high smoke point oils and their applications
  • Familiarity with health risks associated with cooking fumes
  • Awareness of food allergens and their heat resistance
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the health effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and heterocyclic amines (HCAs)
  • Learn about the benefits and techniques of sous vide cooking
  • Investigate the use of air purifiers with HEPA filters for indoor cooking environments
  • Explore the nutritional differences between raw and cooked vegetables
USEFUL FOR

Health-conscious cooks, nutritionists, food safety professionals, and anyone interested in minimizing health risks associated with cooking fumes.

  • #31
russ_watters said:
Good lord, no! I'm pretty sure that's illegal in the US too!

Um...do you know the difference between smoke and fog? If the food isn't brown or black, or there is visible water in the pan, it's fog (condensed water vapor), not smoke. There's no such thing as "normal smoke". Smoke = bad.

My suggestion is you buy yourself an infrared thermometer. That will tell you conclusively if you have a risk of turning your oil or vegetables into smoke. I use mine almost every day.

Here is a thermal camera perspective of it.

received_238853020473305.jpeg


This is the stove.

received_2250142818621056.jpeg


Here is stove and pan

received_878006369308153.jpeg


After just turning it on at low setting.

received_522074491839769.jpeg


At medium to high settings..all coils are engaged.

received_528976564393654.jpeg


In the middle of the pan is a thermal spot. Manual mentions "The THERMO-SPOT turns solid red when the pan is perfectly preheated and ready to cook"

received_559838921295310.jpeg


notice the patterns at the perimeters is gone in the following when the pan is heated enough (ignore the color changes because it was just my camera lighting setting but notice the patterns surrounding it is gone.

received_1078055505926427.jpeg


But notice when the patterns are gone. And I used my thermal camera with emissivity setting of 0.95. The temperature of the pan is 205 degrees C

received_129449211810695.jpeg


And the temperature of the oil is 194 degrees celsius.

received_419000025578289.jpeg


Allow me to ask the following questions based on the above data.

1. What material is used in the pattern at center of pan that can chance color? What is the + and - temperature accuracy when it activates? What temperature it activates?

2. Based on the visible photo of the pan. Is the 0.95 emissivity setting of it ballpark?

3. Notice the temperature of the pan is about 205 degrees celsius when the thermal-spot becomes solid red. I wonder how accurate is the 205 degrees C value.

4. Let's say the pan is really 205 Celsius. What temperature does it bestow to the oil? Or what would become of the temperature of the oil? (also 205 celsius or less?) (I know the thermal camera may not be scanning the oil itself but part of the metal and oil. Right now. I don't have access to a thermometer, only a thermal imager so please share what you think is going on (with regards to emmisivity, the pan temperature and the relationship of the temperature of the pan and oil)).

Thank you!
 

Attachments

  • received_238853020473305.jpeg
    received_238853020473305.jpeg
    45 KB · Views: 252
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
5K