Are cosmic rays considered part of the EMS?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter RAD4921
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosmic rays Rays
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Cosmic rays are not considered part of the Electromagnetic Spectrum (EMS) as they consist of energetic nuclei with mass, distinguishing them from electromagnetic radiation. Historically, there was confusion between cosmic rays and high-energy gamma rays, which are part of the EMS. Recent discussions clarify that while high-energy gammas can originate from cosmic ray interactions, cosmic rays themselves do not fall under the EMS classification. The distinction has been well established for over 50 years, and diagrams that include cosmic rays within the EMS reflect outdated understandings.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Electromagnetic Spectrum (EMS)
  • Knowledge of cosmic rays and their properties
  • Familiarity with high-energy gamma radiation
  • Basic concepts of particle physics and astrophysics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between cosmic rays and electromagnetic radiation
  • Explore the historical context of cosmic ray studies and their classification
  • Investigate the role of cosmic rays in initiating extensive air showers
  • Learn about high-energy gamma ray sources and their relationship with cosmic rays
USEFUL FOR

Astrophysicists, particle physicists, educators in physics, and anyone interested in the classification and properties of cosmic rays and electromagnetic radiation.

RAD4921
Messages
346
Reaction score
1
Are cosmic rays part of the EMS (Electromagnetic spectrum)? I have seen duagrams showing that cosmic rays are part of the EMS and I have heard conflicting reports that cosmic rays are not part of the EMS. I know cosmic rays are energetic nuclei and have mass so I tend to believe that they are not part of the EMS but some scientist seem to inlude them on EMS diagrams. Thanks RAD
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Historically, before CRs were particularly well understood, gammas (part of the "EMS") which came from outside the atmosphere were lumped into 'cosmic rays'.

It's been quite a while (50 years? more?) since the distinction between cosmic rays (the particles) and high-energy gammas became clear-cut.

If you see some diagrams with "cosmic rays" way down at the high energy end of the electromagnetic spectrum, I think you're seeing an echo of those earlier days.

Alternatively, you may be seeing a confusion, or a too-drastic editing. The universe is pervaded by EM, with energies ranging from the plasma frequency cutoff (up in the long-wavelength radio part) to TeV gammas (and beyond? that's an active area of research). At the high energy end, the gammas can have energies that are comparable to energies of cosmic rays, so perhaps an editor added 2 and 2 and got 5?
 
I think the only known source of really high energy gammas is cosmic rays.I also think it is fairly hard to tell the difference between a "gamma or photon cosmic ray" and a "particle cosmic ray" in a cosmic ray detector, because they both initiate extensive air showers.
I believe the percentage of cosmic rays that are photons is still somewhat uncertain, particularly at the highest energies, but they are thought to be the minority .i. e. only about one in a thousand. Google "cosmic ray photons" for some good refs.

Jim
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
449
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K