Programs Are doubts about physics common for undergrads?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a junior physics major who is experiencing doubts about their ability and commitment to the field after transferring to a highly competitive school. They express concerns about their work ethic and the intense dedication required for success in graduate school. Participants emphasize that graduate school demands a significant time investment in physics, often exceeding 30-40 hours a week, and that relying solely on intelligence without hard work can lead to struggles. They highlight the importance of developing a strong work ethic, as many students face challenges when transitioning from high school to university-level physics. The conversation also touches on the dangers of a competitive mindset focused on being "at the top," suggesting that a genuine passion for physics is more valuable than external validation. Ultimately, the consensus is that success in physics is earned through hard work and experience, rather than innate talent alone.
Shahzaib Chaudry
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Hello world. I am currently a junior at a very high powered physics school that u transferred to. I am majoring in physics and have been planning on going to grad school. However, lately I've been having doubts about my major. I came here from another school in the UT system. Everything was fine at my older school. But when I got here, I noticed that so many people lived and breathed physics at this school. And for me personally, I don't want to have to do that. I like physics a lot. But now, my school is making me like it less and less. At first it was fun to learn about it. Now I am really beginning to question whether or not I'm smart enough. I always had a bad work ethic. And I've gotten away with it so far. Including for this semester. But I know later on that's going to have to change and I'm going to need to be spending hous upon hours on physics class work and lab work (lab I don't mind). I'm even beginning to question whether or not I'm smart enough. If I'm not able to answer a physics problem on my own I feel really down about it. And this sucks because I don't want to be just another average joe in physics. I want to be at the top. My question to the undergrads is whether or not you guys feel the same way, and my question to the grass is did you feel the same way in undergrad?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. At grad school, you will be expected to live and breath physics. If you think you're going to go through grad school with minimal effort, then think again. It will take up a lot of time and effort. So if you're not prepared to spend the majority of your day thinking about or doing physics, then grad school is not for you.

2. Bad work ethic is very bad. It will be ok for you now since you're clearly very intelligent. But every single person runs into some moment where intelligence won't save them anymore and they need to work hard to get some progress. If you have never learned how to work hard, you'll suffer a lot and likely even drop out. The geniuses of physics are hard workers. Talent alone brings you nowhere.

3. Doing physics because you want to be "at the top" is a pretty silly feeling. You need to get rid of it. You need to do physics because you have a deep desire to know nature. You shouldn't do physics because other people admire you for it. Furthermore, if you're going to want to be at the top, you'll be very disappointed in grad school. Grad school is typically the place where people find out they're not really as smart as they thought and where they typically struggle. Even very famou people had this very experience. So drop the desires of being at the top, they're harmful to you.
 
  • Like
Likes Delong, Shahzaib Chaudry and Orson
Thank you for the reply. I know in grad school that I am expected to live and breathe physics. But I've been seeing some undergrads doing that here. And what really bothers me is that most of these people still have below a 3.5 GPA after studying 30-40 hours a week. I'm worried that I'm going to have to put in much more time than that in order to get into high powered graduate schools. And the being at the top thing came out wrong. I love physics. But I am a hyper competitive human being and I don't want to do anything unless I'm near the top of what I'm doing. I take this approach in every thing I do. From sports all the way to video games. It's an insecurity that I have. I'm worried bout people looking down upon me if I lose. So I always try to beat them out. Also, I do agree with you. I don't know whether or not I am talented. That's for others to decide. But "hard work beats talent, when talent doesn't work hard." Hard work is infinitely more important than talent. I guess it's just time to man up and do what I have to. There's no other option.
 
  • Like
Likes symbolipoint
It sounds like you`re hitting the undergrad wall to me.

Often students who are bright in physics can do quite well in high school and even through the first year or so of university on natural talent. Some people even derive a sense of pride from it - that they can get high marks and not have to study very much. But this crashes at some point and it`s not difficult to figure out why. On one hand you continuously go through systematic bottlenecks. In high school you`re comparing largely with the general population. At first year university you`re compared against the people who got in and chose to take physics. By second year, you're being compared against other people who have specifically chosen to major in physics. By your third year, some who chose physics initially have dropped out and now you also have some fourth or fifth year students in your classes, sometimes even graduate students. Then you get to graduate school and they`ve taken only the top half of those who managed to complete undergrad. It keeps going too.

So no matter who you are, at some point your natural talent will give out and the only way you can progress is through hard work. Sometimes this is why you see people complaining that they see others who they feel are not as intelligent as themselves doing better. It`s because those other people have figured this out (and perhaps there`s a little bit of ego adjustment needed).

As far as moving forward, those who are most successful tend to be the ones who adopt a mindset that abilities in physics are earned through experience and hard work and not the result of natural talent.

EDIT: Looks like you posted while I was typing...
 
Shahzaib Chaudry said:
And what really bothers me is that most of these people still have below a 3.5 GPA after studying 30-40 hours a week. I'm worried that I'm going to have to put in much more time than that in order to get into high powered graduate schools.

Unfortunately, it's not uncommon for a physics major to work twice as many hours as that some weeks. 30-40 hours per week is reasonable if only doing courses, but to get into a "high powered graduate school" you will need to be quite dedicated to research which can take up as much time (if not more) as classes.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Back
Top