Are Dreams a Glimpse into Our Future?

  • Thread starter Thread starter quddusaliquddus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dreams Future
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around the phenomenon of dreams that seemingly predict future events, with participants sharing personal experiences of dreams that came true. One user recounts a vivid vision of their ex-partner getting injured, which later occurred, leading to a reflection on the unsettling nature of such premonitions. Others contribute their own dream experiences, including lucid dreaming and dreams that inspired creative or scientific insights, suggesting a connection between dreams and subconscious processing.The conversation also touches on the idea of whether animals dream and if dreams can be a form of evolutionary survival mechanism. Some participants express skepticism, proposing that coincidences explain these experiences rather than any predictive ability. The dialogue explores the tension between anecdotal evidence and scientific validation, with some arguing that dreams may reflect subconscious thoughts rather than actual foresight. Overall, the thread highlights a mix of personal anecdotes, philosophical musings, and scientific skepticism regarding the nature of dreams and their potential to predict the future.
  • #31
yolandablongs2lu said:
I do not mean by everything that happen's in the future... I mean only the way you will die?... I just find it weird how he told us how he had the dream... he said that he did know that on his dream the truck that he was driving was not his. At least he said he did not recongnize the truck he was driving... And when he died in the car accident it was his own truck... But the events in his dream of the way he died in the car accident was exactly the way he died in his dream...
My question was can A person dream about the way you will die?... and if so how can this happen?

I did not say everything, you took my answer to mean that. I meant only specific events. This is not an individual case event, this has happened to other people. No one can give you a nuts and bolts answer to your question. I made an assumption to where there might be a probable cause. Space-time was once a singularity, therefore interconnectivety of all matter is a logical assumption, why these events might occur. Why this does not happen to everyone is the greater mystery. Many people dream a diverse amount of things, that do happen, besides death.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Thei interesting thing is that most people who are believe (or inclined-to) that dreams can predict future don't say that as an assumption - then confirm it through 'experience'. most people just experience it - the predictive powers of dreams. So it's not like superstitious people who like to believe in these things. It comes from personal expereince of people who have no interest in such things!
 
  • #33
I believe dreams and premonitions have developed via evolution as a means of survival...
 
  • #34
Overdose said:
I believe dreams and premonitions have developed via evolution as a means of survival...

y doesn't it happen 2 every1? y isn't it inherited?
 
  • #35
quddusaliquddus said:
y doesn't it happen 2 every1? y isn't it inherited?
well i think its probably a newly evolved trait, and as such people probably have this ability to different degrees and in some cases its probably barely preasent. Youve also got to take into account that some people just ignore premonitions/dont tell anyone about them.
 
  • #36
no offence - it sounds liek something out of X-Men
 
  • #37
quddusaliquddus said:
no offence - it sounds liek something out of X-Men
none taken :smile:
 
  • #38
What does it mean, if dreams can tell the future? I just realized that it could have big implications on our abilities while awake - does this mean we can influence the future? What's the point if any, of seein the future? How does it helps us evolution or otherwise? How in the world does such a thing develop in our heads via evolution? Why humans ? - there are other animals with larger brains for example. Hundreds more question. ...
 
  • #39
Are you honestly asking if you can influence the future? Every single action you ever take influences the future.
 
  • #40
Lol ... you missed the point ... there's a difference between influencing it from foreknowledge of events and your everyday actions. It's like saying that if you knew the formulae for a falling object then you could influence it ... now we influence falling objects everyday e.g. footballs, but if you have forrmulae i.e. insight into its future course - then you can adjust its height weight etc ... to change the nature of its fall to the ground.
Using that as an analogy - can this be done with dreams?
 
  • #41
We don't know enough about dreams or the mind in general to determine if they can "predict the future". Though my guess is no since most dreams are just about things you've been thinking about recently... I find I only remember dreams during the school year, when I wake up during a dream (because of my alarm). If I'm allowed to come out of REM naturally I do not remember them. I think the best explanation of dreams would be that you're kinda "defragging" to put it in computer terms... That would explain why if you think about something a lot that's the dream you'll remember, because it takes longer to store away. But as of now all we have are theories, nothing rock solid.

This howstuffworks article has some good stuff in it about dreams:

http://science.howstuffworks.com/sleep.htm
 
  • #42
quddusaliquddus said:
... there's a difference between influencing it from foreknowledge of events and your everyday actions. It's like saying that if you knew the formulae for a falling object then you could influence it ... now we influence falling objects everyday e.g. footballs, but if you have forrmulae i.e. insight into its future course - then you can adjust its height weight etc ... to change the nature of its fall to the ground.
Using that as an analogy - can this be done with dreams?
I already covered this, but a lot of you are operating on the belief that some dreams are, in fact, a snapshot of the future. They aren't. The belief that they are is simply the human propensity for pattern recognition latching on to a dream about a common event, followed by an experience of a similar event.

Sorry guys, but its just a coincidence.
 
  • #43
Have you ever experienced such coincedences? Do tell us about your experiences
 
  • #44
This isn't a personal experience forum. Anecdotal evidence is hardly worth anything.
 
  • #45
When it comes to dreams - it's worth more than nothing.
 
  • #46
Thank you for bringing it to my attention that hardly anything is more than nothing.
 
  • #47
quddusaliquddus said:
:cool: Did anyone have a dream come true - So true that it's just plain weird? ... maybe even beyond explanation? :smile:
I've had a lot of dreams, few I can recall now, but I'm fairly certain none of them came true. Something more the opposite has happened though; events have occurred which seemed to me dreamlike. :wink:
 
  • #48
russ_watters said:
I already covered this, but a lot of you are operating on the belief that some dreams are, in fact, a snapshot of the future. They aren't. The belief that they are is simply the human propensity for pattern recognition latching on to a dream about a common event, followed by an experience of a similar event.

Sorry guys, but its just a coincidence.

Your right in a sense, i could dream of the two towers being struck by 2 areoplanes a week before 9/11 and given all the dreams going on and all the people in the world. Yes it could just be an astronomical coinicidence, and that's the problem with this kind of thing there never comes a point where 'it definitely isn't a coindence'. Wether or not you interpret this kind of thing as future predictions or random coindicences really depends on your biases of what the human mind is capable of and what is possible.
I think dreams can predict the future... :biggrin:
 
  • #49
loseyourname said:
This isn't a personal experience forum. Anecdotal evidence is hardly worth anything.

:smile: :smile: :smile:
 
  • #50
russ: To deny something outright without any evidence (or to believe in something) even though there's a chance it might be true isn't right. Can u not hold out the possiblity?
 
  • #51
I think Russ would like for you to propose some mechanism by which the unconscious human mind would be theoretically capable of predicting the future. You run into an awful dilemma here in that the future hasn't happened yet. How can one have knowledge of that which does not exist?

My guess would be that the human mind is capable of threading together past and present events in such way that it can construct a very highly probable model of what the future will bring, but if the model turns out to be correct, it was nothing more than a lucky guess. A very highly educated and impressive guess, but lucky nonetheless.

One example I can think of is that I once dreamed of the exact circumstances and manner in which a girlfriend broke up with me, three months before it happened. I don't think of myself as clairvoyant. It is likely that I had simply seen signs pointing the way without actually realizing what I was seeing, and it took the dream to bring it to my attention.
 
  • #52
Yes. Then the prediction is a prediction. Was it possible for you to have considered the possibility consciously that this might happen at that time - jus before ouy had the dream? If not then I'd put it into the category of prediction. I understand that as a science forum - mechanisms and controlled tests are everything. But there is at the moment no plausible theory on this other than your model-genrator theory or the time-travelling theory (on this forum anyway). I just want to see if people actually believe its more than a coincedence no matter what mechanisms they explain it with - again this may not interest sum people.
 
  • #53
loseyourname said:
Thank you for bringing it to my attention that hardly anything is more than nothing.

You are welcome. :smile:
 
  • #54
quddusaliquddus said:
But there is at the moment no plausible theory on this other than your model-genrator theory or the time-travelling theory (on this forum anyway).

When you take into consideration the fact that time travel violates the laws of physics as they are currently known, one hypothesis (neither is quite a theory) is a tad more plausible than the other.
 
  • #55
Loseyourname covered it pretty well, but...
quddusaliquddus said:
When it comes to dreams - it's worth more than nothing.
Well that's just it - it is nothing.
russ: To deny something outright without any evidence (or to believe in something) even though there's a chance it might be true isn't right. Can u not hold out the possiblity?
To believe it without evidence is worse. Sorry, I use the scientific method. That ain't it.

In that abstract, anything is possible. But I'd bet my birthday on a lottery ticket before betting on a number I saw in a dream (and I don't do lotteries). Things I know, on the other hand, come from science. To even consider the possibility (without scientific evidence) that dreams are predictions is foolish - more foolish than betting on the lottery.
 
Last edited:
  • #56
Russ, foolishness is a constant. It is the human condition. Science is not a thing, it is a bandwagon of human beings. Yes men/women with a degree to shake and nod ones head. So, you would place the knowledge of others, things outside yourself, unknowns and make that truth? It reminds me of the move "The Deer Hunter" as he yells for more bullets. If a human wants the truth, they will find it, they will realize it.

What you have no clue of haunts me all the time. I have seen the future of humanity. You will not need shades. My visions come to pass and I know the ones that will. I call them out before hand boldly when I know, and I keep my mouth shut when I don't.

The continual unconscious acts of young and old without the responsbility for what we must do. Ah, another movie. "Thing", end of the movie "lets just sit here and wait."
 
  • #57
Scientific evidence demands reproducibility. If we cannot reliably reproduce a phenomenon, does it automatically entail that it doesn't exist? Maybe we just don't know how to reproduce it. If we humans weren't as bright as we are, perhaps we would never figure out how to reproduce static shocks. But our failure to reproduce the phenomenon would be a shortcoming on our part, not good evidence against the phenomenon in question.
 
  • #58
TENYEARS said:
Russ, foolishness is a constant. It is the human condition. Science is not a thing, it is a bandwagon of human beings ... If a human wants the truth, they will find it, they will realize it ... What you have no clue of haunts me all the time. I have seen the future of humanity...

A little off-the-topic but I want to share it. I checked the forum this morning and the main page said the last post on this thread was by Hypnagogue. Since I like to read Hypnagogue's writings I decided to check it out, but when I clicked on the thread I was taken to Tenyears' post instead. So I started to read his post thinking it was Hypnagogue's, and the thought that came to my mind was, "oh my, is Hypnagogue playing with LSD again?" :confused:

(this is a private joke :smile:, if you don't get it nevermind)
 
  • #59
Like I said before, confused us was never enlighted. Bad choice of name, it is not that he could not have been, it is just that during his life, from what he expressed, it indicated nada. Expression though is not a requirement, so I guess I am talking out my hat or maybe I am giving you food for thought. Do you have a stomach to digest it or are you not hungry, the question is self answering, but the posting can produce hunger.
 
  • #60
wtf...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
256
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
863
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K