Are Electron Orbitals Always Spherical in Shape?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 3K views
Happiness
Messages
686
Reaction score
30
The probability distribution of the position of the electron of a hydrogen atom is related to the following polar plots
Screen Shot 2016-02-25 at 5.18.27 pm.png


Suppose the electron is excited from the ##1s## orbital to the ##2p_x## orbital. Does it make sense to talk about the ##2p_x## orbital having a dumbbell shape pointing in the ##x## direction since the ##z## axis can be pointing in any direction? Shouldn't all orbitals be spherical when we consider there is an equal probability for the ##z## axis to point in any direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Happiness said:
Does it make sense to talk about the 2px2p_x orbital having a dumbbell shape pointing in the xx direction since the zz axis can be pointing in any direction?
What are shown in the picture above are actually the cross-section of ##|Y_{lm}(\theta,\phi)|^2## in the xz plane, so when viewed as a 3D distribution, the ##2p_x## orbital does not have a dumbbell shape.
 
Happiness said:
Suppose the electron is excited from the ##1s## orbital to the ##2p_x## orbital. Does it make sense to talk about the ##2p_x## orbital having a dumbbell shape pointing in the ##x## direction since the ##z## axis can be pointing in any direction?
Be careful that what you posted are pictures of the the spherical harmonics, which are complex functions, while ##p_x## is a real function, linear combination of spherical harmonics, and is not an eigenfunction of ##\hat{L}_z##.

Happiness said:
Shouldn't all orbitals be spherical when we consider there is an equal probability for the ##z## axis to point in any direction?
No, you can have a polarized sample. At equilibrium, you should have on average an isotropic distribution, but one can prepare an atomic sample in a given ##l, m_l## state. Note that the preparation aspect is going to define a laboratory z axis: the choice of axes is no longer arbitrary.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Happiness
Must the spin angular momentum of an electron have a definite direction or could it be in a superposition of being in manydifferent directions? If so, how can we prepare such a superposition?
 
Happiness said:
Must the spin angular momentum of an electron have a definite direction or could it be in a superposition of being in manydifferent directions? If so, how can we prepare such a superposition?
It is always in some superposition. If it is aligned along z in some coordinate system, it is in a superposition in any coordinate system where z' is not colinear with z.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Happiness
DrClaude said:
It is always in some superposition. If it is aligned along z in some coordinate system, it is in a superposition in any coordinate system where z' is not colinear with z.

So there must always exist exactly one coordinate system in which the spin is aligned along its z axis?
 
Happiness said:
So there must always exist exactly one coordinate system in which the spin is aligned along its z axis?
Yes. In the presence of an external field, you also have to account for spin precession, so it is possible that that coordinate system is a rotating one.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Happiness
I just want to add that which orbital gets excited depends on the polarisation of the exciting electromagnetic field. The propagation direction defines one axis and the direction of the em field fixes another one. It is convenient to chose the quantization axes accordingly.