Are Fujifilm Disposable Cameras Good for Resolution and Color Quality?

  • Thread starter Thread starter leroyjenkens
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Camera
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the quality and usability of Fujifilm disposable cameras, particularly regarding resolution and color quality. Participants explore various aspects of using these cameras, including film speed, exposure limits, and development options.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the meaning of "27 Exp./Poses" on the camera box, suggesting it refers to the number of pictures that can be taken.
  • Another participant explains that ASA 400 indicates a medium speed film suitable for various lighting conditions, while slower and faster films have different requirements for exposure.
  • There are mentions of the possibility of obtaining digital copies of pictures after development, with some participants suggesting to check with the developer for available services.
  • Some participants note that the lens in disposable cameras is typically wide-angle, which may affect performance in different settings, particularly outdoors.
  • One participant shares their experience using multiple disposable cameras annually, expressing satisfaction with their performance for the cost.
  • There are discussions about the availability of film development services, with references to Walgreens and other retailers that may offer scanning to digital formats.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the difference between developed negatives and printed photos, with some participants emphasizing the need for prints to obtain digital copies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions on the quality of Fujifilm disposable cameras, with some satisfied with their performance while others raise concerns about resolution and color quality. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the overall effectiveness of these cameras.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the lack of detailed specifications on the camera packaging and varying experiences with film development services. The discussion also reflects differing views on the quality of disposable cameras compared to digital alternatives.

leroyjenkens
Messages
616
Reaction score
49
Ok, I just got a camera and I haven't used one in like 20 years.
I got a fujifilm flash. It was 5$. And I think it's a disposable camera.

On the top of the box it says 27 Exp./Poses. Does that mean that's how many pictures I can take with this thing? That's the only number I see on the entire box that could be the # of pictures.

It says 400 speed film on the back. I have no idea what that means. This box seems to limit the information to reserve room for the 2 other language translations of said limited information.

I heard you can get digital copies of the pictures when I take it back to the store for development. Is that true with disposable cameras?

Has anyone used a Fujifilm flash before? Is it any good as far as resolution and color and stuff like that?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
27 exposure means the number of snapshots you can take,
ASA 400 is a medium speed film for outdoor lighting, decent indoor lighting or flash.
ASA 200 would be a slower film meaning that more light has to enter the camera or for a longer time for a good exposure.
ASA 800 is a faster film and could be used in low lighting areas or of moving objects

you will have to ask your developer he if offers the digital service. Otherwise keep the negative and take it to some place that does.
Fuji is a popular brand.
 
256bits said:
27 exposure means the number of snapshots you can take,
ASA 400 is a medium speed film for outdoor lighting, decent indoor lighting or flash.
ASA 200 would be a slower film meaning that more light has to enter the camera or for a longer time for a good exposure.
ASA 800 is a faster film and could be used in low lighting areas or of moving objects

you will have to ask your developer he if offers the digital service. Otherwise keep the negative and take it to some place that does.
Fuji is a popular brand.
Or, once the pictures are developed, scan them into your computer as a digital file. Most printers, even dirt cheap ones have a scan function, just depends on the quality you want.
 
leroyjenkens said:
Ok, I just got a camera and I haven't used one in like 20 years.
I got a fujifilm flash. It was 5$. And I think it's a disposable camera.

On the top of the box it says 27 Exp./Poses. Does that mean that's how many pictures I can take with this thing? That's the only number I see on the entire box that could be the # of pictures.

It says 400 speed film on the back. I have no idea what that means. This box seems to limit the information to reserve room for the 2 other language translations of said limited information.

I heard you can get digital copies of the pictures when I take it back to the store for development. Is that true with disposable cameras?

Has anyone used a Fujifilm flash before? Is it any good as far as resolution and color and stuff like that?

Thanks.

The lens in the disposable cameras is usually a wide angle. They are OK indoors, but outside they are not very good for pictures of anything in the distance.
 
Evo said:
Or, once the pictures are developed, scan them into your computer as a digital file. Most printers, even dirt cheap ones have a scan function, just depends on the quality you want.

Not every scanner will be able to scan negatives.

Unless by "developed pictures" you mean prints, not just a developed negative?
 
One cheap digital camera is worth 4.8 x 1027 disposable 35mm cameras.
 
Borek said:
Not every scanner will be able to scan negatives.

Unless by "developed pictures" you mean prints, not just a developed negative?
Thanks for clarifying, yes, I meant prints.
 
It looks like the Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash has been discontinued, but it's probably similar to the current Quicksnap Superia:

http://www.fujifilm.com/products/quicksnap/lineup/superia/

It looks like it contains a standard 35mm film cartridge, so any place that processes Fujifilm should be able to handle it. As edward notes, Walgreens can process them and put them in digital format on a CD for you. I remember doing this once or twice with normal 35mm Kodak film at CVS years ago when I still used film, and I suspect they probably still do it. Also check Wal-Mart.
 
  • #10
leroyjenkens said:
<snip>
Has anyone used a Fujifilm flash before? Is it any good as far as resolution and color and stuff like that?

Thanks.

I use about 5-10 of these per year. For what they cost, they work extremely well- no complaints.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K