Are Maxwell's equations theoretically sound?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Maxwell's equations are fundamentally sound and accurately describe electromagnetism, encompassing both electric and magnetic fields. The discussion highlights that these equations are a series of differential equations that effectively model the behavior of light as an electromagnetic wave. Despite some misconceptions about magnetism's elusiveness, it is well understood within the framework of modern physics, particularly through quantum electrodynamics. The consensus among professional scientists is that electricity and magnetism are unified aspects of a single electromagnetic force.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic theory
  • Basic knowledge of quantum electrodynamics
  • Awareness of the historical context of scientific discoveries, particularly regarding Maxwell and the electron
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of Maxwell's equations in electromagnetism
  • Explore the principles of quantum electrodynamics and its relation to Maxwell's equations
  • Investigate the experimental evidence supporting the theory of light as an electromagnetic wave
  • Research the historical timeline of discoveries in electromagnetism, focusing on Maxwell and the electron
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, students of electromagnetism, and anyone interested in the foundational theories of light and electromagnetic fields.

Xilus
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
are maxwells equations theoretically accurate?
do they describe electromagnetism?

its basically a series of differential equations for describing the electric, and magnetic fields.
including particle motion and the field it creates?

the electric field makes a lot of sense. but what is magnetism?
why is it so elusive?

why do we consider light similar to an electric field?
why would we unify? i say we don't unify.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Xilus said:
do they describe electromagnetism?
Not completely, that is why we developed quantum electrodynamics.

Xilus said:
why would we unify? i say we don't unify
Its a done deal, not currently a topic of debate amongst professional scientists.
 
Xilus said:
i say we don't unify.

In science, an opinion has to be justified to have merit. It's not like "I don't like broccoli". As Dale says, it's too late - we already know that electricity and magnetism are two aspects of the same, electromagnetic, force.
 
Xilus said:
the electric field makes a lot of sense. but what is magnetism?
why is it so elusive?

It's not elusive. It's understood extremely well. What is it that gives you the impression that we don't understand magnetism?

Xilus said:
why do we consider light similar to an electric field?

Lots and lots and lots and lots and lots of experiments support the theory that light is an electromagnetic wave. Nothing else predicts the effect that light will have better than our current electromagnetic theories. Maxwell's equations are enormously successful in accurately describing the behavior of light.
 
ok there is no way maxwell wrote the equations without the discovery of electrons.
 
Xilus said:
ok there is no way maxwell wrote the equations without the discovery of electrons.

Errr ... so you dispute history now? Maxwell died in 1879, the electron was discovered in 1897.
 
A very long and misinformation-laden digression has been removed from this thread.
Many posters have put much work into thoughtful and well-reasoned responses to the misinformation, and I regret that their work has disappeared with this thread cleanup.

If you would like a copy of your removed posts for future use or to start another thread, any mentor can recover them for you - just ask in the next few days.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lish Lash and weirdoguy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K