Are most notable inventions derivative of military purpose?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the assertion that many notable inventions are derived from military purposes. While some participants argue that military funding has significantly influenced technological advancements, particularly in the space program and robotics, others contend that inventions primarily arise from perceived necessities rather than military applications. Examples such as the development of robotic exoskeletons for both military and civilian use illustrate the dual-purpose nature of some technologies. The conversation highlights the ongoing debate about the relationship between military funding and innovation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of military technology and its historical impact on civilian innovations
  • Familiarity with the space program's evolution and its military connections
  • Knowledge of robotics and exoskeleton technology
  • Awareness of the concept of perceived necessity in invention
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the historical influence of military funding on technological advancements in the space program
  • Explore the development and applications of robotic exoskeletons in both military and civilian contexts
  • Investigate the concept of perceived necessity in invention and its implications for future innovations
  • Examine case studies of technologies that transitioned from military to civilian use
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for historians, technology enthusiasts, military analysts, and anyone interested in the intersection of military funding and technological innovation.

LightbulbSun
Messages
64
Reaction score
2
I keep hearing about most of our notable inventions being derivative of military purpose. I tried searching for more information to see if this was actually true, but couldn't find anything substantive. So is it true?
 
Science news on Phys.org
LightbulbSun said:
I keep hearing about most of our notable inventions being derivative of military purpose. I tried searching for more information to see if this was actually true, but couldn't find anything substantive. So is it true?

I don't think most of our notable inventions are for military purposes over all, but they do subsidize a lot of technology, especially within certain niches. The space program would be one example where it might be true most developments were paid for by the military. Until recently, just about all of our launch vehicles have been modified ICBMs. Until very recently, the most sophisticated satellites have been military satellites. Only in the last decade or so has the civilian space industry been lucrative enough for much of an effort for a purely civilian technology.

A lot of military technology was driven by the cold war and I'd say that while there's still a huge market for purely military technology, there's a trend towards adopting civilian technology to military uses, which is probably the norm if you exclude the cold war era.
 
I thought they were all about sex;
language - ask for sex.
Fire - keep warm while having sex.
Weapons - kill wild animals that interrupt you while having sex.

Of course the anaology breaks down with modern inventions like the internet ...
 
mgb_phys said:
Of course the anaology breaks down with modern inventions like the internet ...

Haven't spent much time in chatrooms, have you? :biggrin:
 
Moonbear said:
Haven't spent much time in chatrooms, have you? :biggrin:
Aww...you killed it, moonbie!
 
mgb_phys said:
I thought they were all about sex;
language - ask for sex.
Fire - keep warm while having sex.
Weapons - kill wild animals that interrupt you while having sex.

Of course the anaology breaks down with modern inventions like the internet ...
How about Liquid Paper?
 
zoobyshoe said:
How about Liquid Paper?

Female secretary says to male chemist, "Why don't you come over to my kitchen and help me cook something up?" Hmm...
 
zoobyshoe said:
How about Liquid Paper?
You don't know? - You have led a sheltered life :biggrin:
 
mgb_phys said:
I thought they were all about sex;
language - ask for sex.
Fire - keep warm while having sex.
Weapons - kill wild animals that interrupt you while having sex.

Of course the anaology breaks down with modern inventions like the internet ...

I read that 80% of the internet traffic is porn so maybe not...
 
  • #10
Margarine!

In 1869 Emperor Louis Napoleon III of France offered a prize to anyone who could make a satisfactory substitute for butter, suitable for use by the armed forces and the lower classes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margarine#History
 
  • #11
wildman said:
I read that 80% of the internet traffic is porn so maybe not...
Do we have an icon for the wooshing sound a comment makes as it goes over a poster's head?
 
  • #12
mgb_phys said:
You don't know? - You have led a sheltered life :biggrin:
Yes, but now I'm intrigued. Liquid paper...hmmmmm...
 
  • #13
LightbulbSun said:
I keep hearing about most of our notable inventions being derivative of military purpose. I tried searching for more information to see if this was actually true, but couldn't find anything substantive. So is it true?


ummm i would say that most of our notable inventions are the result of a perceived necessity.
 
  • #14
slugcountry said:
ummm i would say that most of our notable inventions are the result of a perceived necessity.
That's catchy.
 
  • #15
I read that 80% of the internet traffic is porn so maybe not
That was probably because it requiring so much picture and video, making an off-ratio on bandwidth spent on nonpornographic graphic and video vs. pornographic graphics and video, which there used to be much less of. But now, every website is graphics-intensive and no body is afraid to add extra or video, so I wouldn't be surprised if nonporn trumps porn as for bandwidth.
ummm i would say that most of our notable inventions are the result of a perceived necessity.
zoobyshoe said:
That's catchy.
You know what they say, Mother is the necessity of invention.
 
  • #16
  • #17
Astronuc said:
Interestingly, a colleague sent me a CNN video link on a technological development that could be useful as a military tool or it could be useful for a variety of manual jobs.

Solider of the future
http://www.cnn.com/video/?/video/tech/2007/11/27/yeates.ut.robo.soldier.ksl

I'd prefer the application to peaceful uses.

It could also be pretty useful for some disabilities (http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20070418f3.html ).

The Japanese domestic market for robotic exoskeletons is predicted to soar to over $8 billion a year by 2025 when many of the baby boomers hit their 80's. I imagine there will be a huge market in the US, as well. (Just think, quite a few of us could be using these things.)

It's hard to invest in something that doesn't pay off immediately (which is why developing exoskeletons for soldiers will probably lead the way) but awful hard not to invest when there's such a huge payoff somewhere down the road.

Limited exoskeletons (say for an ankle) have had some success, as well. As long as a signal is coming down the nervous system, the exoskeletons seem to work pretty well.

Help for people like http://www.theonion.com/content/node/39133 might take a little longer - not because it couldn't be done, but because the user has to learn an entirely new brain process for controlling their movements. Coordination is a lot better if the user moves the exoskeleton exactly the same way they move their own arm or leg.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
702
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
663
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
625
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K