Are Multi Universes and Infinite Space Possible with Big Bang Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter David_777
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinite
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the possibility of overlapping multi-universes and the concept of infinite space in relation to the Big Bang theory. Key concerns include the implications of a background space that could affect the observable universe and the challenges of explaining how edges of these universes might interact without violating established principles like the Copernican principle. The conversation emphasizes that while these ideas are mathematically intriguing, they present significant challenges in astrophysics. Observational data is deemed less reliable compared to mathematical models in addressing these complex issues. The dialogue highlights the ongoing tension between theoretical possibilities and empirical evidence in understanding the universe's structure.
David_777
Messages
11
Reaction score
10
Might multi universes overlap? Might there be limitless space to infinity in which Big Bangs unsynchronized in time overlap and have done so through eternity past? What is it about Big Bang theory that makes impossible the inifinite of all space versus the limit of that space which has expanded from the Big Bang? Why can't a Big Bang occur with matter and space outside it's expanding sphere? Can such matter meet?


my first post here, hi out there
...David
 
Space news on Phys.org
Hi Dave! Welcome to PF. The problem with that idea is it imposes a background over which it is overlayed. A bigger problem is it introduces a non-casual influence over the observable universe. And that introduces the even bigger problem of explaining how the 'edges' overlap without violating the Copernican principle.
 
I would tend to think those issues are mainly a matter of the mathematical context space/time/matter is described as though doesn't necessarily invalidate the ideas.

...David
 
They are mainly mathematical matters, but that is the most pressing issue in astrophysics. We rely much more heavily on mathematical solutions than observation - which is almost always less reliable.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top