ADeAngelis
- 1
- 0
Smells bad, and inconsistent with SN1987A…
There had been a delay of ~3h between the neutrinos and the gammas in SN1987A (it had been explained by astrophysical reasons, though). If one however interprets it as physical, takes the distance of the SN (168000 ly) and rescales it to the distance between CERN and Gran Sasso, one would expect at GS a delay of
Dt ~ 10000 s * (700e3/(168000*3e7*3e8)) ~ 5 ps
which is 1 millimeter… It is true that the SN neutrinos where in the MeV, but it looks strange that something dramatic happens between the MeV and the GeV…
Alessandro De Angelis
PS – People had claimed and then withdrawn, in the case of the SN1987A, a neutrino detection 1 day before – and also speculated about neutrinos being tachions; this would make however 50 ps, still not enough…
There had been a delay of ~3h between the neutrinos and the gammas in SN1987A (it had been explained by astrophysical reasons, though). If one however interprets it as physical, takes the distance of the SN (168000 ly) and rescales it to the distance between CERN and Gran Sasso, one would expect at GS a delay of
Dt ~ 10000 s * (700e3/(168000*3e7*3e8)) ~ 5 ps
which is 1 millimeter… It is true that the SN neutrinos where in the MeV, but it looks strange that something dramatic happens between the MeV and the GeV…
Alessandro De Angelis
PS – People had claimed and then withdrawn, in the case of the SN1987A, a neutrino detection 1 day before – and also speculated about neutrinos being tachions; this would make however 50 ps, still not enough…