Are Protons Magnets? Investigating Spin & Charge

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter davidong3000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnet Proton
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Protons and electrons exhibit magnetic properties due to their spin and charge, making them behave as magnets with distinct north and south poles. The magnetic moment of a proton aligns with its spin, while the electron's magnetic moment is opposite to its spin direction. This phenomenon is foundational for technologies such as Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The magnetic fields produced by these particles can be quantified, with the magnetic field at a proton in hydrogen due to the electron's magnetic moment being approximately one million tesla.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, particularly angular momentum and spin.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of magnetic moments and magnetic fields.
  • Knowledge of the right-hand rule for determining magnetic pole orientation.
  • Basic principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of spin and charge in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) in detail.
  • Investigate the relationship between magnetic fields and particle interactions.
  • Learn about the applications of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in medical diagnostics.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, chemists, medical imaging professionals, and anyone interested in the fundamental properties of subatomic particles and their applications in technology.

davidong3000
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
i know electrons have spin and charge which makes them the smallest magnet. protons also have spin and charge. does this mean they are magnets too with a north and south pole?

Precisely where are these poles in relation to the spin axis of the proton and electron?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
davidong3000 said:
i know electrons have spin and charge which makes them the smallest magnet. protons also have spin and charge. does this mean they are magnets too with a north and south pole?

Precisely where are these poles in relation to the spin axis of the proton and electron?


Yes, protons are magnets, and they precess. So do neutrons oddly enough. In spite of having no charge, they have a magnetic moment, due to the charged and spinning quarks inside them (the quarks' charges cancel out in the neutron, but add in the proton). These facts are behind the chemistry analytical tool NMR, for nuclear magnetic resonance, and that in turn is behind the medical device MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
 
so if i was looking down on the axis of an electron/proton in such a way so that it appears to be spinning anti clockwise, would i be looking at the north or south pole?
 
davidong3000 said:
so if i was looking down on the axis of an electron/proton in such a way so that it appears to be spinning anti clockwise, would i be looking at the north or south pole?
The magnetic moment of the proton is in the same direction as its spin, so its N pole would be on top. The electron magnetic moment is oppositeto its spin direction because the electron is negatively charged.
Its top pole is a S pole.
Note, even though these particles have "spin", they are not rotating.
They are said to have spin because they have angular momentum.
This follows from relativistic QM (the Dirac equation) without their actually rotating.
 
Meir Achuz said:
The magnetic moment of the proton is in the same direction as its spin, so its N pole would be on top. The electron magnetic moment is oppositeto its spin direction because the electron is negatively charged.
Its top pole is a S pole.

Can u define "top"?
 
Last edited:
The north pole would be at the "top" of the earth.
By "top" I meant where the head of the arrow woud be in the right hand rule for rotation. (If fingers curl in direction of rotation, the vector omega is in the direction of the thumb.)
 
Meir Achuz said:
The north pole would be at the "top" of the earth.
By "top" I meant where the head of the arrow woud be in the right hand rule for rotation. (If fingers curl in direction of rotation, the vector omega is in the direction of the thumb.)

And actually the magnetic "pole" of the Earth on the north pole is ...
a magnetic south pole !
 
vanesch said:
And actually the magnetic "pole" of the Earth on the north pole is ...
a magnetic south pole !

so Earth is like a giant electron then . xcept Earth is not - charged. both Earth and electrons have their s pole on top according to rh rule.

so exactly how many teslas are single electrons and protons spitting out? and do the magnetic fields of these charged particles loop back on themselves from top to bottom like on ordinary magnets?
 
Last edited:
davidong3000 said:
so Earth is like a giant electron then . xcept Earth is not - charged. both Earth and electrons have their s pole on top according to rh rule.

so exactly how many teslas are single electrons and protons spitting out? and do the magnetic fields of these charged particles loop back on themselves from top to bottom like on ordinary magnets?
The second answer is yes.
The first answer is a bit messy to calculate, but I get that the B field at the proton in hydrogen due to the electron's magnetic moment is about
one million tesla.
 
  • #10
Meir Achuz said:
The second answer is yes.
The first answer is a bit messy to calculate, but I get that the B field at the proton in hydrogen due to the electron's magnetic moment is about
one million tesla.

what if it didn't have an electron? say a lone proton or lone electron, what would the tesla reading be?
 
  • #11
davidong3000 said:
what if it didn't have an electron? say a lone proton or lone electron, what would the tesla reading be?
I used the H atom just as an example for the B field a distance of 1/2 angstrom away from a lone electron. The B field would fall of like 1/r^3, so an electron's B field would be about 100,000 T 1 angstrom away.
The B field of a proton would be about 600 times smaller than that of an electron at the same disstance.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
853
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K