Are quantum computers required to be cold to reduce Brownian motion?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the necessity of cooling quantum computers to reduce thermal motion and its impact on qubit performance. Participants explore the relationship between temperature, thermal motion, and error rates in quantum computing, with a focus on different types of quantum systems.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that quantum computers need to be close to absolute zero to minimize errors, linking this to the reduction of Brownian motion due to thermal agitation.
  • Others clarify that it is not Brownian motion but rather thermal motion that is relevant, particularly the coupling of qubits with thermal phonons in solid-state systems.
  • There is a discussion about the similarity between thermal motion and Brownian motion, with some participants asserting that thermal motion is a subset of Brownian motion, while others argue the opposite.
  • A participant notes that for ion trap-based quantum computers, cooling is necessary to reduce "motional quanta," while in solid-state systems, thermal motion can generate excitations, particularly from "hot" photons.
  • One viewpoint emphasizes that cooling is primarily about reducing energy leakage into the system, which can lead to unintended excitations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between thermal motion and Brownian motion, with no consensus reached on whether thermal motion is a subset of Brownian motion. The necessity of cooling for different types of quantum computers is also debated, indicating multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific types of quantum computers (ion trap and solid-state) and their cooling requirements, but the discussion does not resolve the definitions or implications of thermal motion versus Brownian motion.

iVenky
Messages
212
Reaction score
12
I understand that based on what I have read online quantum computers are required to be close to absolute zero because it introduces less error. Is it because brownian motion due to thermal agitation of molecules reduces with temperature?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not Brownian motion, simply thermal motion. In the solid state case, it is the coupling of the qubit with thermal phonons.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Amrator and iVenky
DrClaude said:
Not Brownian motion, simply thermal motion. In the solid state case, it is the coupling of the qubit with thermal phonons.
Isn't thermal motion similar to Brownian motion?

This is the thermal noise we are talking about, right?
 
iVenky said:
Isn't thermal motion similar to Brownian motion?
Brownian motion usually implies the motion of a particle embedded in some medium, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brownian_motion
iVenky said:
This is the thermal noise we are talking about, right?
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: iVenky
DrClaude said:
Brownian motion usually implies the motion of a particle embedded in some medium, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brownian_motion
Yes.
Ok, thanks but thermal motion is a subset of Brownian motion, right?
 
iVenky said:
Ok, thanks but thermal motion is a subset of Brownian motion, right?
No, the other way around. Brownian motion could be seen as one type of thermal motion.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: iVenky
iVenky said:
Isn't thermal motion similar to Brownian motion?

This is the thermal noise we are talking about, right?

It depends on the type of quantum computer. For ion trap based quantum computer you need the trapped ion to be "cold" (which btw is somewhat difficult concept when you are talking about single particles) to reduce the number of "motional quanta".
In solid state systems "thermal motion" can indeed be a problem (because it can generate excitations, e.g. quasiparticles), but mostly it is about reducing the number of "hot" photons that can reach your qubit.

Overall, I would say that it is better to think about the need for cooling as as way to reduce the amount of energy that can "leak" into your system (via photons or phonons) and unintentionally cause excitations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrClaude

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K