Quantum Computers: Room Temperature Superposition Explained

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conditions necessary for qubits in quantum computers to exist in a superposition state, particularly focusing on the temperature requirements. Participants explore the relationship between quantum superposition and phenomena such as the double slit experiment, questioning why interference patterns can occur at room temperature while qubits typically require low temperatures.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that while quantum computers require low temperatures for qubits to maintain superposition, the double slit experiment can still demonstrate superposition at room temperature with single photons.
  • Another participant explains that quantum computers need to store superposition long enough for operations, requiring isolation from environmental interactions, unlike the single particle interactions in the double slit experiment.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that photonic qubits are less sensitive to temperature because they do not interact significantly with their environment, unlike matter-based qubits.
  • One participant emphasizes the need for perfection in quantum bits, stating that any interaction with the environment can disturb them, contrasting this with the more forgiving nature of the double slit experiment, which can still yield patterns despite imperfections.
  • Another participant reiterates the initial question about the relationship between temperature and superposition in quantum computing and the double slit experiment, providing a link to a related article on quantum entanglement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of temperature on superposition in quantum computing versus the double slit experiment. There is no consensus on the reasons behind the differences in behavior between photonic qubits and matter-based qubits, nor on the implications of these differences for quantum computing.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the varying requirements for qubits based on their physical nature (photonic vs. matter-based) and the conditions under which superposition can be maintained. The discussion highlights the complexity of interactions in quantum systems and the challenges in achieving ideal conditions for quantum operations.

Kara386
Messages
204
Reaction score
2
I was reading about quantum computers and the article was saying about how cold everything has to be for qubits to exist in a superposition state. Why do things like the double slit experiment with single photons work at room temperature? Because when you get the interference pattern with single photons, that's a superposition of states as well, isn't it? Or that's how it was explained to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the key is that with a quantum computer, you "store" the superposition long enough to perform several quantum operations on it. While it is being stored, it needs to be isolated from anything that could measure of affect it.
Also, in the interference experiment, you are only dealing with a single particle at a time. With a quantum processor, you are guiding the interaction of many qubits.

There are a handful of quantum computer "gates". Perhaps someone with more knowledge about this than myself can explain why these "gates" cannot be applied dynamically to photons. I suspect the problem is that even though a photon can interact with superpositions of itself, it will not interact very well with other photons.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kara386
Photonic qubits are not sensitive to the temperature of the environment since they do not really interact with anything.
Qubits made of matter: be it atom, ions or superconductors do need to be cooled to very low temperatures.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kara386
Congratulations on a very intelligent question.

In addition to what the others said, there is a huge difference in the perfection needed to succeed. A quantum bit can be disturbed by any interaction with the environment during a long period of time..

The double slit experiment needs many photons or many electrons to form an interference pattern on the screen. If some of them get scattered before the slits, they don't get through the slits and thus aren't counted. Photons scattered after the slit and before the screen, as well as photons from the apparatus walls or elsewhere, prevent the pattern on the screen from being perfect. That's especially true where theory says that zero photons should hit that spot on the screen. Zero is very hard to achieve in real life. But even if the interference pattern is imperfect, the mere existence of any pattern at all makes the double slit experiment succeed.

I remember when I first heard of the double slit experiment. The explanation started with only one slit being open and looking at the pattern on the screen. The fact that opening a second slit could cause fewer photons to hit any spot completely amazed me. That simple observation leads one to the inescapable conclusion that we must look beyond classical physics for an explanation. IMO, that is all that's needed to declare the double slit experiment successful.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kara386
Thanks for the answers, it's very interesting topic!
 
Kara386 said:
I was reading about quantum computers and the article was saying about how cold everything has to be for qubits to exist in a superposition state. Why do things like the double slit experiment with single photons work at room temperature? Because when you get the interference pattern with single photons, that's a superposition of states as well, isn't it? Or that's how it was explained to me.
Here's a recent article you may be interested in:
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/...-photon-quantum-entanglement-sets-new-record/
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K