Are Stephen Coonts' Saucer Series Books Worth Reading?

AI Thread Summary
Stephen Coonts' "Saucer" is a fast-paced 340-page read that is part of a three-book series, which includes "Saucer - The Conquest" and "Saucer - Savage Planet." The narrative effectively allows readers to suspend disbelief by not overcomplicating the story, particularly regarding the propulsion mechanism of the spacecraft. The book presents a plausible scenario for a long-buried technology still functioning after 140,000 years. Discussions highlight the blend of politics, espionage, and science fiction adventure in Coonts' work, with some questioning his classification as a true science fiction author. The conversation also references Coonts' earlier work, "Flight of the Intruder," which is noted as a strong entry in his bibliography.
gmax137
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Messages
3,124
Reaction score
3,582
I recently picked up Stephen Coonts, "Saucer" at a public library book sale. Have just finished it, a very fast read 340 pages. In another thread I learned:
jrmichler said:
If you start a thread there, I could reply and say that the two following books, Saucer - The Conquest and Saucer - Savage Planet are also good reads. But, since this is the Feedback Forum, I did not say that because I do not want to hijack this thread. :smile:
I had no idea that this is a three-book series. I suppose now I will have to find the other two books.

It is a good example of allowing the reader's suspension of disbelief full reign, that is, not overcomplicating the story by trying to rationalize the propulsion mechanism.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gmax137 said:
It is a good example of allowing the reader's suspension of disbelief full reign, that is, not overcomplicating the story by trying to rationalize the propulsion mechanism.
Oh yes, calculating the physics of solar power electrolyzing water from the nearest lake to use in a hydrogen-oxygen rocket engine that has a high enough impulse to make Earth orbit is a real stretch. It is a plausible explanation for how something buried for 140,000 years can still function, which is sufficient for the important part of the story.
 
I was just thinking about this series the other day while at Half Price Books and couldn't remember the author. I read the first and second books years ago, but was unaware of the third.

I think I need to go looking for them in earnest again. 😏
 
But Coonts is not even a real SF author, so what do you expect?
 
gmax137 said:
I recently picked up Stephen Coonts, "Saucer" at a public library book sale. Have just finished it, a very fast read 340 pages. In another thread I learned:

I had no idea that this is a three-book series. I suppose now I will have to find the other two books.

It is a good example of allowing the reader's suspension of disbelief full reign, that is, not overcomplicating the story by trying to rationalize the propulsion mechanism.
I have just finished Baxter's "The Thousand Earths" and am set to buy my next eBook.

What is the ratio of Coontz's "Saucer" in terms of politics and spies to science fiction adventure?
 
BWV said:
But Coonts is not even a real SF author, so what do you expect?
Truth. Dude got started with "Flight of the Intruder", iirc. (Damn good book, okay movie.)
 
I wonder how much stories were written, that involve space fighters, and arent so soft as Star wars. I dont think missiles totally make fighter craft obsolate, for example the former cant escort shuttles if one wants to capture a celestial body. I dont insist fighters have to be manned (i enjoyed Enders game about someone control the events for afar) but i also think it isnt totally unjustifiable.
I thought I had discovered a giant plot hole in Avatar universe, but apparently it's based on a faulty notion. So, the anti-gravity effect that lifts whole mountains into the sky is unrelated to the unobtanium deposits? Apparently the value of unobtanium is in its property as a room temperature superconductor, which enables their superluminal drive technology. Unobtanium is found in large deposits underground, which is why they want to mine the ground. OK. So, these mountains - which...
So far I've been enjoying the show but I am curious to hear from those a little more knowledgeable of the Dune universe as my knowledge is only of the first Dune book, The 1984 movie, The Sy-fy channel Dune and Children of Dune mini series and the most recent two movies. How much material is it pulling from the Dune books (both the original Frank Herbert and the Brian Herbert books)? If so, what books could fill in some knowledge gaps?
Back
Top