Are Tachyons Relevant in Modern Physics?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter edpell
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Tachyons, theoretical particles that travel faster than light, remain a contentious topic in modern physics, particularly in discussions surrounding experimental validation. Recent references to tachyons in the context of Brookhaven data (RHIC) have sparked debate, with some suggesting that the term may have been confused with "Pomerons." The discussion highlights that tachyons indicate instabilities within theoretical frameworks, such as string theory, where their presence suggests incorrect vacuum states and leads to breakdowns in calculations. Ultimately, while tachyon exchange calculations can be performed, they lack physical significance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of theoretical physics concepts, particularly in particle physics.
  • Familiarity with string theory and its implications regarding tachyons.
  • Knowledge of experimental validation methods in high-energy physics.
  • Experience with mathematical modeling in physics, particularly in the context of particle interactions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of tachyons in string theory and their role in vacuum stability.
  • Explore the concept of Pomerons and their significance in particle physics.
  • Study the experimental methodologies used in high-energy physics, particularly at facilities like RHIC.
  • Investigate dual models in particle physics and their relationship with tachyon exchange calculations.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, particle physicists, and researchers interested in the implications of tachyons and their role in modern physics theories.

edpell
Messages
282
Reaction score
4
Are Tachyons in or out of favor these days? I seem to recall going to a talk about Brookhaven data (RHIC) that invoked ladder diagrams with Tachyons in them. And no one in the room seemed to flinch. What up with that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmmm. Good question.

I would suppose that the entire problems lies within the scope of experimental validation.
Our scope is currently limited to c and sub-luminal observations/experiments.

Not sure how to get around this. Perhaps there is a way, but I don't know of one.
 
This is a very strange thing! Are you sure they said "tachyons"? Perhaps they said "Pomerons"? Do you have a reference to the talk?

The only other possibility I can think of is that they were trying to do some "Dual Model" calculation. But I don't understand how "tachyon exchange" makes any physical sense.

Tachyons are instabilities in the theory. Their presence signifies that you are in the wrong vacuum, and your calculations break down. This is what the "string theory tachyon" is, for example.

You can, of course, perform calculations of "tachyon exchange", but then you're just playing a mathematics game; your final answer will not have any physics in it!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K