Are There Truly Any Massless Particles?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Allojubrious
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Massless
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the existence of massless particles, particularly focusing on the photon and its mass properties. Participants explore the implications of experimental measurements and the concept of masslessness in the context of particle physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether any massless particles exist, citing a belief that photons may have a very small mass.
  • Another participant clarifies that the photon is considered massless based on experimental upper bounds, emphasizing that no experiment can definitively measure its mass as zero.
  • A later reply suggests that while the photon could be massless, the inability to measure its mass with absolute certainty means it is only known to be less than a certain threshold.
  • Participants discuss the limitations of experimental precision in measuring properties like mass, using analogies to illustrate the concept of measurement thresholds.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the existence of truly massless particles. There are competing views regarding the implications of experimental measurements and the definition of masslessness.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in experimental precision and the dependence on measurement thresholds when discussing the mass of particles like photons.

Allojubrious
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
My question is simple: Are there any massless

My question is simple: Are there any massless particles?

Because I've now found out that the photon, which I always thought to be massless, actually has an extremely small amount of mass. It is something along the lines of a billionth of a billionth of an eV. Anyway, now I'm wondering whether there are any actual and true massless particles.

Thanks,
Al
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Allojubrious said:
My question is simple: Are there any massless particles?

Because I've now found out that the photon, which I always thought to be massless, actually has an extremely small amount of mass. It is something along the lines of a billionth of a billionth of an eV. Anyway, now I'm wondering whether there are any actual and true massless particles.

What you probably saw was an experimentally determined upper bound. You can never say any property of a particle or really, anything, has a given value to an infinite amount of precision. There exists no experiment where the velocity of light can be shown to be exactly zero. There are always experimental inaccuracies.

When a source says that the mass is [itex]m_{photon} < 10^{-18} {{eV}\over{c^2}}[/itex], that means an experiment was done that can measure a photon mass of no less than [itex]10^{-18} {{eV}\over{c^2}}[/itex] but was unable to detect a mass.
 


Oh I see. That is interesting.
So then there really are not any massless particles that exist?
 


Allojubrious said:
Oh I see. That is interesting.
So then there really are not any massless particles that exist?

No, that's not what I said. The photon could be massless, but there exists no experiment that could tell you with certainty that the photons mass is 0.0000000..ad infinitum. All you can say is that "if the photon has a mass, it has to be less than X because X is the lowest mass we can measure by experiment". Every experiment will have a threshold as to how small a mass it can measure. The photon has always been below those thresholds so we say it appears to be massless with the caveat that we can only measure with a certain precision.

Imagine trying to measure the speed of a car at rest. Let's say you point a radar detector at it. Now, that radar detector has a certain precision; let's say it can only measure a speed to within 0.1mph. If you point the thing at a car and it registers 0, it's not technically proper to say that the car is moving at 0mph, you can only really say that it's moving at < 0.1mph because that's all your radar detector can tell you. It may be truly at rest, but you can't build a radar detector to measure with perfect precision.
 


Ohhhhhh now I get it, well thank you very much, you have answered my question.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K